My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2011 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
08-08-2011 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:27 PM
Creation date
6/27/2018 1:30:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/8/2011
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Elections Proposal <br />August 8, 2011 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />As shown on the previous page, we have preliminarily budgeted $38,893 for the 2012 <br />election. The amount proposed by the County is less than our budgeted amount. On this <br />basis, it would appear that the one-year County proposal would be a better value ($36,500 <br />contract versus $38,893 budgeted in 2012) however the proposed budget for 2012 <br />includes about $8,000 in staff wages which would continue to be paid, thus the proposal <br />would actually end up costing the City about $5,000 more for the year. <br /> <br />The one-year contract prepared by the County is proposed as an introductory arrangement <br />to be followed by a four-year contract assuming both parties wish to continue. The City <br />would anticipate a cost savings in the future years when the one-year cost of $36,500 <br />becomes spread over two years. Thus, in 2013 and 2014, the annual cost would drop to <br />$18,250 per year. In comparison, the averaged annual cost in Mounds View has been <br />$24,290. <br /> <br />Staff believes contracting with the County would be beneficial for a number of reasons, <br />such as: <br /> <br />• Eliminates the need to send staff to multiple election training sessions <br />• Puts the responsibility for elections with a County division whose only <br />function and purpose is to coordinate and manage elections <br />• Potential cost savings through economies of scale—as more communities <br />contract with the County, the overhead for each decreases <br />• Provides for consistent budgeting from year to year rather than the <br />alternating highs and lows <br />• Allows staff to focus on other key work responsibilities that suffer during <br />election seasons <br />• Provides flexibility in staffing, allowing employees to focus on their primary <br />responsibilities and other duties as assigned <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Based on the direction provided at the August 1 Work Session, staff prepared Resolution <br />7816 which approves a one-year contract with Ramsey County for election services with a <br />four year extension and recommends approval of same. The City Attorney’s office has <br />reviewed the proposal and found the agreement acceptable. Subsequent to the City <br />approval, County staff will present the same contract to the Ramsey County Board of <br />Commissioners for their authorization. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />City Administrator
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.