Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise Fee on Xcel Energy Electric and Natural Gas Operations 1 <br />within the City of Mounds View and publish an Ordinance summary. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Hull stated he would not support the short term budget fix that was established 4 <br />in the 1990’s as the City has now become dependent on the funds. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Council Member Mueller indicated she supported the Ordinance as the fees were passed along to 7 <br />all energy consumers in the City. These fees are used to support police and fire services in the 8 <br />community. She explained the franchise fee used to be 4% and has been reduced to 3.87%. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Council Member Stigney did not support the franchise fee as presented. He felt the franchise fee 11 <br />should be increased to 4% to assist the City in recapturing revenues. He suggested a friendly 12 <br />amendment to the motion to raise the franchise fee to 4%. 13 <br /> 14 <br />FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Stigney/Gunn. To increase the Franchise Fee for Xcel Energy 15 <br />Electric and Natural Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View to 4%. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Council Member Stigney stated the increase would only minimally impact the tax payers while 18 <br />bringing in additional revenues from across the community. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Mayor Flaherty disagreed with the amendment stating the franchise fee was a temporary fix that 21 <br />has been used year after year in the budget. The City has become reliant on the franchise fee 22 <br />funds. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Mueller indicated the franchise fees were created at a time when income was 25 <br />being lost from TIF districts. She did not feel the City could cut $500,000 out of the budget at 26 <br />this time while providing adequate services to the community. She would support the increase in 27 <br />the franchise fee to 4%. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Stigney agreed that the Council did not have a way to offset these funds within 30 <br />the budget. He felt the increase to 4% would greatly benefit the tax payers in the end. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Gunn commented if the franchise fee were to be eliminated, the City had no 33 <br />plan to make up these funds. The City has become reliant on these funds and until there was a 34 <br />way to make up $500,000 within the budget, the franchise fee could not be eliminated. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Hull stated the funds could be made up by slightly increasing property taxes 37 <br />which were tax deductible. The impact on residents would be minimal. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Finance Director Beer clarified that the increase would be more than $35, which is being paid in 40 <br />franchise fees. He estimated this expense to be more like $50-60 per year. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Hull agreed to support the franchise fee at 4%. 43 <br /> 44 <br />AMENDMENT VOTE: 45