Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 07E <br />Meeting Date: Oct 24, 2011 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 864, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code Pertaining to Dynamic Display Signs <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> The City amended its sign code on January 12, 2009 to include operational requirements <br />and conditions for the use of dynamic display signage with the adoption of Ordinance 816. <br />The ordinance instituted several regulations regarding such signs as well as creating a <br />conversion process by which billboard companies could install a dynamic display billboard <br />face if it removed two-full faces elsewhere in the community. The City Council discussed <br />potential revisions at its work session on September 6, 2011 and directed staff to prepare <br />an ordinance for first reading, which occurred on September 26, 2011. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Since the adoption of the ordinance in 2009, it has become evident that that the amount of <br />time that each unique message must be held on dynamic signs was more than necessary. <br />The intent of the original ten second hold requirement was to prevent the sign’s message <br />from becoming a distraction to motorists. It has become clear that the hold time is much <br />longer than it needs to be. As a means to assess a more appropriate hold time, messages <br />on the City Hall sign have cycled every three seconds, every four seconds and every six <br />seconds. The four second hold time appears to allow optimum cycling of the messages <br />without becoming a distraction. <br /> <br />In addition, the ordinance includes several updates which articulate specific luminance <br />standards for dynamic display signs. The standard is based on “Nits” (candelas per square <br />meter) and limits such signs to no more than 500 Nits at night and up to 7,500 Nits during <br />the day. No sign erected subsequent to the adoption of the ordinance will be permitted <br />that has the capability (as certified by the owner) to be brighter than 7,500 Nits. <br /> <br />Also, the Code presently allows dynamic display signs to be located on school grounds, <br />church property or other institutional land uses within a residential district upon approval of <br />a conditional use permit. One of the conditions added is that the color of the lights be <br />amber, which is much “softer” than the harsh red such as found on the City’s sign or the <br />Walgreens’ sign. <br /> <br />Finally, the ordinance will require that any dynamic display sign that has the capability of <br />accessing and utilizing MN Amber Alert technology shall display such messages as they <br />are made available by the MN Dept. of Public Safety or other responsible agency. <br />