Laserfiche WebLink
fl ar )�,,. ,t J ,y l 'I <br /> j l ;b <br /> Page 10 <br /> January 13, 1997 • <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> what the private sector is paying. He would really like the staff to look at all of these concerns. He <br /> personally feels that any type of salary compensation package should be based more on a merit system. He <br /> would like to get some of the staff and the council members together to go over the policy and see if it is indeed <br /> in the best interest of the residents. Furthermore,until this is accomplished,he would recommend that the <br /> council initiate a hiring freeze of any new employees into the city. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to approve Resolution 5071,Approving the 1997 Compensation and <br /> Insurance Contribution Schedule for Non-Union,Public Works and Park Maintenance Personnel. <br /> A discussion followed in regard to the employee health insurance coverage. Mayor McCarty asked if a <br /> change could be made to the resolution to state.. .shall pay the entire premium for full-time single health <br /> insurance coverage up to$330.,which would place the single coverage on the same level as the family <br /> coverage. <br /> Mr.Kessel explained he believes perhaps the wording needs to be changed slightly. He thinks it should state <br /> that there is$330.for insurance per employee and the employee has the option of choosing the insurance plan. <br /> He noted that as it now works,an employee can use up to the$330.limit to obtain various insurance(dental, <br /> additional life,etc.)coverage. <br /> Various wording options were discussed to clarify this policy. <br /> Ms.Trude stated she would be in favor of voting on the Resolution without making any ch.:r ges as to the 111 <br /> wording for the insurance. This is the same language that has been used for at least the past three years and <br /> she feels it is best to leave it intact. Furthermore,it will merely cause unnecessary cone for employees. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Table Resolution No. 5071 to allow staff time to make <br /> appropriate revisions. <br /> VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay(Trude) Motion Carried <br /> Mr.Kessel noted that he has some concern in tabling the 3%increase in compensation and would recommend <br /> that the council reconsider this. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to reconsider the tabling of Resolution No.5071. <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nay Motion Carried <br /> TABLING MOTION RECONSIDERED: <br /> VOTE: 0 ayes 5 nays Motion Failed <br /> The council discussed various changes which they felt could be made to Resolution No.5071. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to amend Resolution No.5071 as follows: <br /> 1) removing"and insurance contribution" from the Resolution title; <br /> 2) removing"and insurance"from the first paragraph; <br />