My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:34 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 9:05:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/24/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/24/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c" REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION <br /> Agenda Section: <br /> STAFF REPORT . Report Number: - 45-1416w"e <br /> Efi <br /> 411 AGENDA SESSION DATE May 1 . 1995 Report Date: 4—'27-9:3 <br /> DLSPOSITION <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Pedestrian Bridge Services; Storm Water Ponding Alternative; <br /> Citizen Review Committee <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> No comments to supplement this report ./714-4 --ft-A-L <br /> Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as a asary.) <br /> FTMMARY; <br /> City Councilmember Julie Trude will present to the City Council three <br /> issues pertaining to the construction of the pedestrian bridge across <br /> Highway 10. One is the recommendation for contracting engineering, <br /> design and inspection services with BRW. The second pertains to the <br /> opportunity to coordinate the pedestrian bridge project with ridding the <br /> storm water runoff pond that exists at the corner of Long Lake Road and <br /> Hwy 10. Thirdly is the appointment of a resident committee that can <br /> moffer input to the design of the pedestrian bridge. Please review the <br /> emorandums provided from Councilmember Trude. <br /> Please recall that funding for the engineering, design and inspection <br /> services are not eligible in the grant. However, special project money <br /> is available for this purpose. Also, the $120, 000 match for pedestrian <br /> bridge construction is only 20% of the cost and is stated in the 5-year <br /> capital plan. Finance Director Brager has provided a memorandum that <br /> outlines the financing mechanism for this project. The funds do not use <br /> general funding, but instead special project funding and therefore will <br /> not impact the general operating budget for 1996 . <br /> Finally, I wish to address concerns that the pedestrian bridge will not <br /> be used. Through proper planning and design, the pedestrian bridge will <br /> be used because the bikeway/walkway will lead users to the bridge and in <br /> fact hinder the crossing of Hwy 10 and Long Lake Road intersection with <br /> the use of barriers such as landscaping, decorative fencing, berming, <br /> etc. The key is in the design. Making the bridge an attraction with <br /> special features such as kiosks, benches, flowers, art displays, etc. is <br /> important for establishing a pattern of use. Ease of use is also a <br /> necessity. Fortunately, we have a very reputable and capable design <br /> firm in BRW that understands the needs for ease and elective use of the <br /> pedestrian bridge. It is anticipated that a representative from BRW <br /> will be present at the May 1 Work Session to respond to your concerns. <br /> ///w . , <br /> ,,o,......,..,:,..to <br /> 0 :- Forestry <br /> Sa=ri.. , ctor of Parks, Recreation & Fores ry <br /> I REOOM_NIENDATION; r <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.