My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:34 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 9:05:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/24/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/24/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JUL-10-1995 17:12 FROM Sr. MARY'S ,'''F'.S. CENTER TO 7843462 P.01 <br /> FAX to Clty of Mounds View - L2 <br /> FROM - Linka Holey, Director of Institutional Research, Saint Mary's University - <br /> 874-9877 Ext. 112 <br /> July 9, 1995 <br /> TO: Members of the Moundsy� 1 ew City Council <br /> FR: Linka e , Resrdertt an member of the Trailways AdvisoryGroup <br /> 9�7w��t'ast y <br /> and the Focus 2000 - Housing and Neighborhood Task Force <br /> RE: Funding far Pedestrian Bririg a across Highway <br /> 10 <br /> The cnncern over the division of our community by Highway 10 has been <br /> expressed since i moved into Mounds View in 1976. Both the social and safety <br /> implications have been widely discussed in many public forums. The <br /> construction of a pedestrian bridge is a vital response to this long-standing <br /> problem. <br /> I was delighted to hear that theicity had received a federal transportation grant <br /> with an unbelieveable match of20/80 percent As a former grant writer, i am <br /> well aware of theup front and background work required to obtain such a deal. <br /> My respect for the city staff conuinues to rise as I hear of this type of action on <br /> community-generated concerns`. <br /> I was totally shocked to hear that the Council maynot fund the 20% <br /> to secure <br /> the grant. I cannot comprchcnd why any Council member would vote against a <br /> highly public supported project_with such a positive return on investment. This <br /> project has support of all ages ' iithin the pcpuiaticn. is this support not <br /> understood by the Council? Are there particular costs that make this project not <br /> as cost beneficial as one would expect? Even a 50150 match would be good. <br /> I feel strongly that the Council should support thisj <br /> roect. You can use this <br /> P <br /> project to publicize your commitment to addressing big prebems like the <br /> division of a city by a major highway. Your attention to cost by successfully <br /> competing for the 20/80 grant is also an example cf your fiscally conservative <br /> management approach. You saw the positive energy of a city brought together <br /> for the Festival in the Park today. The parade, the activities, and the fireworks <br /> were grand! The investment irk the symbolic and functional pedestrian bridge <br /> will bring you the same, if not more, public support as the annual festival has1110 <br /> brought you today. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.