My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:34 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 9:05:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/24/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/24/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
s <br /> I <br /> July 18, 1995 ,f0Z‘ ) ,:,.. .- <br /> ':.--,-i' <br /> Y • MOUNDS VIEW • <br /> Fundingdebate <br /> ties ..- <br /> _ <br /> TIF <br /> upbridge project -, <br /> While some council members feel From page 3 <br /> SHELBY r11COLAUS-DuIVSKI TIF would be a good source of enhancement. `. <br /> IF <br /> for the sal,others feel "It's a community ;. <br /> A$120,000 difference of opinion funding proposal, That's a permitted It's a reue- <br /> ogin at the fate of a pedestrian it shouldn't be used for projects use.That's a use.It's a recce- <br /> is tugging which do not create jobs. ationaAll staff I've talked to say it's a <br /> bridge which would link Mounds Council Member Sue Hankner thed ue.r Somehow,we're not m_ <br /> View's east and west sides. Council said the project does not meet the pew <br /> The Moundsbo View City for its requirements to be funded with supposed to do what legislators <br /> is debating how it will pay don't want us to do for fear of <br /> share of the proposed for pedes-00 inion, is legal„ angering them,"she said. <br /> ""That, in my op The city has two to wm- <br /> projectto cross it easier0 she said. "I've talked to advocates years to before it <br /> traneto�o�Highway of tax-increment and legislators, plete the proposed project The council isexpected <br /> its Aug. work and they agreed with me that that's loses the state grant <br /> the issue during its Au . 7 work -If approved,the project would be <br /> an inappropriate use of tax-incre- <br /> • <br /> session. went financing." constructed next summer. But the <br /> ane city was dndapproved0 for a statetf But Council Member Julie Trude project's timeline would necessitate <br /> thegr <br /> em that would fund council percent members project, saying the the city choosing an architectural <br /> project. But y defended <br /> ro o d pedestrian bridge is a and engineering firm this fall, <br /> 11can are now questioning $120000. legal use of the TIF fund,according Tie said.posed bridge has been <br /> pay tee rwnag leadge for yeaen <br /> At issue is whether the city should to the city's lawyer. discussed by city <br /> use a portion of its $2 million tax- TIF/Page 10 <br /> increment financing With Highway 10 slicing through <br /> money. the city's center, the bridge has <br /> i - been proposed as a way to link the <br /> two sides of the community. <br /> "It's kind of a missing link for <br /> bike transit as well,"Trude said."I <br /> wouldn't feel safe crossing that <br /> highway except in a vehicle." <br /> Hankner said she has supported <br /> the project since she was the city's <br /> mayor in the 1980s."But it still has <br /> the same problems it did then,"she <br /> said, referring to the financing <br /> issue. <br /> "A pedestrian crosswalk would <br /> be an abusive use of that (TIF) T_ <br /> money,"Hankner said. <br /> The city is in the process of sego- <br /> tinting the purchase of a few blight _ <br /> ed properties along Highway 10— <br /> including the Auto Central site and ' . <br /> another near County Road I— a <br /> project that would be better suited A. <br /> for'TIF funding,Hanlmer said. <br /> The only other option the city has � 4 <br /> to fund the project is through the L <br /> property tax levy,Hankner said. <br /> 14. <br /> Hankner said she would support 7. <br /> increasing the tax levy only if resi- <br /> dents can'muster enough support . <br /> for a tax hike. <br /> "You've got to get a lot of people <br /> to get me convinced,"she said. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.