Laserfiche WebLink
!' <br /> - al...........6....„ ;71aez .s <br /> , October 26 1995 <br /> 1 <br /> t •-MouNDs ViEw • <br /> 11/ <br /> Ilt <br /> Till Fate of tax hike rides <br /> mi ; , , • . . .+ <br /> on bridge support <br /> ,,,, ,:. <br /> SHELBY NICOLAus-DUNSKI ' Supporters have urged the coun- <br /> t:; ; cif to approve the proposal,saying <br /> How much Mounds View tax- the bridge will provide a safe way <br /> : :1 payers will_pay in the:city's por- for pedestrians, mainly children, <br /> • tion of their taxes in 1996 rides on to cross the highly trafficked high- <br /> !. the fate of a proposed pedestrian ::way to get to retailers. and:.a <br /> ! bridge. .:. limey. <br /> City Council members are using • But support was waning,mostly . <br /> • the proposed bridge, to be built by Lake Court Drive neighbors, <br /> over Highway 10 near Long Lake during a budget informational <br /> • Road, as their litmus test for a meeting Monday night. <br /> property tax increase. "There are a lot of people who <br /> The $12 million 1996 budget can't afford a property tax <br /> wasinitially drawn up to include increase for something they don't <br /> • no property tax levy increase. use and can't understand," said <br /> Later, a 3 percent levy increase Gene Wagner, 2647 Lake Court <br /> 4' was included as a cushion for any Circle. <br /> unforeseen expenditures in the His sentiments were echoed by <br /> ! coming year. That amount is Henry Ruggles, 2629 Lake Court <br /> . expected to be lessened or elimi- Drive,who said the council would <br /> nated as soon as the city receives be"opening up a hornets'nest"by IIIfinal property tax estimates from building the bridge. Ruggles, a <br /> Ramsey County. •Planning Commission member, <br /> But the council could add anoth said the bridge would be the hub <br /> er 3 percentto the increase if of friction between skateboarding <br /> enough residents convince it to and in-line skating youths and <br /> pay for the bridge's construction. walking seniors. <br /> The . proposal received a If the council approved a budget <br /> $480,000 federal grant for its con- funded without a tax increase,city <br /> struction.The grant will cover 80 taxes on the average-valued home <br /> percent of building costs and of$85,302. would decrease by <br /> requires the city to chip in the. L26 percent,or S3. <br /> iremainder.. A 3 percent tax increase would <br /> With;xtrtitional study and archi- increase city taxes on that same <br /> ' ' tectural fees, the city estimates its home by about $7, or 2.88 per- <br /> share will be$185,000 for the pro- cent. And a 6 percent increase <br /> • posal, if approved.About S50,000 would cost that homeowner an chance to their feelings <br /> of that.will be tax-generated and additional SI7,or 7.03 percent. will dents a abe the Nov. air9 budget publicg <br /> the remaining is proposed to come will <br /> hearing. That hearing, atruth-in- <br /> from other city funds. But most homeowners are expect= <br /> E ed to see some sort of increase in taxation public hearing,will be resi- <br /> their taxes payable in 1996 because dents' last chance to voice their <br /> houses increased in value by an opinions on the budget prior to its <br /> average2_.65 percent this year. Dec. 6 final approval. The budget <br /> Council Member Sue Hankner includes a S3.5 million general fund <br /> said she would rather approve a budget. representing a 1.9 percent <br /> budget with a zero percent increase. increase over the 1995 budget. <br /> If residents want the bridge.she said "I'd like to see a ,Ic d number of <br /> she would rather cut the bud+get so people. one :Iirecuon or another—a <br /> that taxes do not increase. good representation of the cityn <br /> She encouraged residents to make just from one area."she said. <br /> council members aware of their Mayor Jerry Linke agreed. "We <br /> support or opposition to the pro- need to hear from our residents."he <br /> posed bridge. said. <br /> One avenue that will give resi- <br />