My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/03/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/03/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:03 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 11:47:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/24/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/24/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EU RMKflO <br /> ONLY <br /> 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 <br /> . League of Minnesota Cities Phone: (612) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 <br /> Cities prrmotii gexc¢nence Fax: (612) 281-1299 • TDD (612) 281-1290 <br /> Price of Government <br /> Briefing Paper <br /> Issue synopsis/League position: <br /> The Price of Government legislation requires that the Governor recommend and the House and <br /> Senate adopt targets for the overall percentage of personal income collected by the state and local <br /> units of government. These targets are adopted every two years in the odd-numbered, budget <br /> setting year. <br /> The targets were originally established as a long-term barometer of trends in state and local <br /> government revenues. The chief House author, Representative Ann Rest, has insisted that"the <br /> law is not intended to be used for making short-term course corrections, like persuading local <br /> governments to lower their levies." Nonetheless, since the law was enacted in 1993, the Price of <br /> Government targets have been used to criticize local units of government. <br /> This past year, the Commissioner of Revenue criticized city officials for increasing the proposed <br /> 0 1997 property tax levies beyond the POG targets. In fact, as the law is written, the POG targets <br /> do not isolate property taxes, but instead projects total local government revenues. The <br /> commissioner's letter is evidence of the confusing nature of the law and the need for <br /> clarification. <br /> Messages for Legislators: <br /> The original intent of the price of government legislation should be reviewed and the clarified. <br /> The law should not be used as a short-term limitation on local government levies, but used as a <br /> tool to understand the impact of policy changes, demographic changes and other factors that <br /> influence local revenue trends. If the long-term planning aspect of the law cannot be clarified, <br /> POG, as it applies to local units of government should be repealed. <br /> Pending Major Bills/Status: <br /> The Governor recommended and the House and Senate have approved POG targets for the <br /> upcoming two biennia. The targets adopted by the House and Senate are less aggressive in <br /> reducing the overall price of government than the Governor's original proposal. <br /> After holding informational hearings on the price of government law earlier in the session, House <br /> Tax Chair Dee Long has indicated that she will likely recommend an interim study of the POG <br /> law that will hopefully lead to future recommendations on the application of the POG targets. <br /> 411) prepared by: Gary Carlson <br /> AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.