My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/03/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/03/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:03 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 11:47:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/24/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/24/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Resolution 495-97 <br /> 110 <br /> March 5, 1997 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas <br /> so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential <br /> property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 2185 Pinewood <br /> Drive, low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive <br /> Plan. <br /> 2. The Geographical Area Involved. <br /> 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br /> The lots in this area are either the same size as the subject lot or are smaller. The homes in <br /> this area are of a similar style and construction, with detached or attached garages. Since <br /> 2185 Pinewood is a corner lot and also fronts County Road I, it has more visibility than the <br /> other homes in this area. Although the proposed garage is larger than is typical for the <br /> area, the placement of the garage hides the bulk of it from view from adjacent streets. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> • Removing the existing, one car garage and replacing it with a new, larger garage would be <br /> a benefit to the area in the sense that it is an upgrade to an existing building, and an <br /> improvement to the property. <br /> 5. The Demonstrated Need for Such a Use. <br /> The applicant has stated that this garage is needed to store vehicles used for racing, a hobby <br /> the residents partake in. Previously, the applicant was asked by the City to remove a large <br /> car carrier from their rear yard. Currently, the car carrier is in the front driveway because <br /> the existing garage is too small. A new, larger garage would enable the applicant to keep <br /> the car carrier and race cars inside, as well as other yard appliances. Keeping these items <br /> within the garage as opposed to outside will reduce the appearance of clutter on the <br /> property. <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings regarding the criteria for <br /> approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: <br /> (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other <br /> public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> (8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be <br /> • provided. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.