Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. i i <br /> Staff Report No.qi'ZOZS Ws <br /> Meeting Date: April 7, 1997 <br /> III Type of Business: WK <br /> WK.• Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br /> Item Title/Subject: Discussion and Consideration of Revisions to the <br /> Assessment Policy <br /> Date of Report: April 3, 1997 <br /> In reviewing and formulating the mock assessment roll for the Old Highway 8 project, staff <br /> identified some possible inequities in the method of various assessment formulas. Staff also <br /> received objectionable comments from the business owners involved in the Old 8 project. It is <br /> staff's recommendation that Council consider revising the policy. The revisions provided below <br /> (from a staff report presented to Council on 2-24-97, with additions), would create a document <br /> that would attempt to equalize primarily the storm sewer assessment method. In conversations <br /> with the City Attorney and Engineer, it was noted that storm sewer assessments can be <br /> particularly difficult to establish and prove benefit to the properties. <br /> III Staff rpt. 2-24-97 <br /> The storm sewer assessment method utilized on the Bronson Drive project was to formulate the <br /> total expenses for the storm sewer construction and divide that amount by the acres within the <br /> drainage districts served by the project. For Bronson Drive the assessable amount was 112 acres <br /> at $1,198.15 /acre. For the Old 8 project that amount is 12.66 acres at $4,871.39/acre. This <br /> obviously was an enormous concern on the affected property owners and highly susceptible to <br /> objection and possible litigation. <br /> In conversations with other City staff, engineers and the City attorney about this subject, two <br /> methods were discussed. <br /> Option No. 1 <br /> The first option being that the property owners in drainage districts that would receive benefit <br /> from a trunk storm sewer, only be assessed an amount (by lot or acre) determined and adjusted <br /> annually by resolution using the Engineering News Record (ENR). Trunk sewers are generally <br /> larger in diameter and require deeper bury which is why these sewers are more expensive to <br /> construct. These truck lines would in all likelihood be constructed on the City's major streets, <br /> such as MSA routes. Should a project be initiated on a particular street that requires storm sewer <br /> laterals which would be connected to the trunk lines, the Surface Water Utility would fund these <br /> expenses. The residential storm sewer assessment for Bronson Drive went from a low of$131.00 <br /> • to $647.00, the average being $389.00. Staff would recommend a flat $400.00 assessment which <br /> would cover a 1/3 acre residential lot. Multifamily housing that exceeded the 1/3 lot would be <br /> assessed based on the number of acres, divided by the unit cost ($400.00 per 1/3 acre). <br />