Laserfiche WebLink
State • <br /> ituneeds better mix of revenue sources <br /> ; 7 <br /> y Dee Long and Doug Johnson � v" `��`�" terns and consumer appetites <br /> Percent of revenue from 'Big Three" taxes have shifted, but our sales tax <br /> "Powerful economic. demo- base reflects decades-old buying <br /> -raphic, and technological 60% trends. <br /> hanges are occurring in Minne- 53.6% So,given the relative merits of <br /> eta, the nation, and the world. ` ' the"Big Three."how do we mod- <br /> ltho ugh these changes are 50% ernize our tax system to make it <br /> zrgely beyond control or ma- : • NET PROPERTY TAX more efficient and equitable? <br /> ipulation by Minnesota (or by • \� i Back in 1984, the Latimer <br /> • <br /> ny state government), they can- 40°iCommission recommended <br /> of be ignored in the design of the 291„ broadening the sales tax to in- <br /> ,ate's tax structure." ' dude personal services and new <br /> — Report of the Minnesota 30% clothing. Others have advocated <br /> ax Study Commission (the INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX .• - 27.7%'' new models of business tax- <br /> --atimer Commission"), De- • ._• •°•�.� .•`•`~j? ation, such as the value-added <br /> ember 1984. 20% •- • <br /> •-• 23.2%; tax or a business activities tax. <br /> With 10 proposals intro- �' "• Neither idea is well-received in <br /> seed in the Legislature, 1997 10%14.5° ' .;.: . a political climate where elected <br /> :ay go down as an importantSALES TAXES 1 officials are afraid of even the <br /> :ar in the history of property � 8.0% i � mere mention of a new tax.How- <br /> x reform in the state of Minne- p i ever, a broadened sales tax base <br /> )ta. The chances are good that 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 (coupled with a lower rate) could <br /> )me combination of relief and actually yield a more progressive <br /> form will be accomplished. Source:Minnesota Department of Revenue <br /> P and stable tax. And a w . <br /> ut as we move toward the next designed business activities <br /> ;illennium, it seems prudent to relationship to creation of response to public demand for could actually improve the sta <br /> :fleet on the insights offered by wealth. A notable example is property tax relief and the state's business climate by shifting some <br /> .e Latimer Commission some "infopreneur" and Microsoft need for replacement revenues. of the tax burden from Min- <br /> )zen years ago. founder Bill Gates. While the income tax is a far bet- nesota-based companies to those <br /> The property tax was adopted It is often argued that the ter measure of wealth than the based in other states or countries. <br /> 1849 by the First Territorial property tax is the most stable property tax,it also is vulnerable We must reduce our depen- <br /> ,sembly"to establish and main- — and therefore desirable — of to changes in the state and dence on the property tax, once <br /> in common schools."Property our taxes because it is less vola- national economy.The prolifera- and for all. But to do so—even <br /> x collections actually go back tile than other taxes in times of tion of fringe benefits,tax-exempt more significantly than we have <br /> veral millennia,with tributes of economic distress. Both history compensation and various credits proposed in our reform plan- <br /> -ain or cattle submitted by ten- and predictions show this not to and deductions erodes our will require some form of alter- <br /> its and land owners to the ruling be the case,however. income tax base and leads to native revenue. , <br /> ass.The connection of wealth to In the early 1980s,Minnesota's inequities among taxpayers. Let us be clear: There is no <br /> nd holdings held s.wav until the farm crisis led to decreases in Our corporate income tax is need to raise the overall tax bur <br /> dustrial Revolution. farm values of 50 percent and beset with similar problems: den on Minnesotans, but there <br /> As we moved from field to more. In the early 1990s, slack base erosion and inequitable ex- is a need to discuss a more ap= <br /> story,property became less re- demand for downtown business elusions, plus outmoded meas- propriate mixture of revenue <br /> :We as a measure of wealth.An property caused values to drop 10 ures that have not kept pace sources to pay for the level of <br /> ,ing couple who purchased a percent or more. Now, econ- with the changing nature of the state and local services that Min= <br /> )me with taxes that seemed omists and planners foresee val- marketplace. nesotans have come to expect. <br /> fordable years ago now find uation losses in the residential The newest of Minnesota's <br /> at their fixed income renders market as the baby boom gener- taxes, adopted in 1967, is the — Rep. Dee Long, DFL-Minne- <br /> em hard-pressed to meet taxes ation reaches retirement and re- state sales tax. Once again, this apolis, is chair of the House Tax <br /> vied against the same home locates to townhomes and con- new tax was enacted to offset Committee;Sen. Doug Johnson, <br /> ?cause of inflationary increases dos. rising property taxes. Thirty DFL-Cook, is chair of the Senate <br /> its value. Technological ad- Demographic shifts will also years ago, a consumption tax Tax Committee. <br /> nces have created a business affect Minnesota's individual and made sense and a narrow base <br /> mate in which property hold- corporate income taxes. These targeted goods rather than ser- What homeowners can expect <br /> gs also have little or no direct taxes we-'first enacted in 1933 in vices. Since then, spending pat- reform.Turn to A27. <br />