My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/04/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/04/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:18 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 1:40:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/7/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/7/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EDITORIALS <br /> METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br /> • <br /> Mend, don't end, <br /> governing <br /> re �onal <br /> �- <br /> If Minnesota Rep. Peg Larsen ' If anything, <br /> and her allies get their way, the the Metro <br /> Metropolitan Council would be dis- Council needs <br /> mantled and efforts to manage the I new incentives <br /> region's growth would be irrepara- and powers. <br /> bly harmed. Fortunately, a I • <br /> Minnesota House committee has <br /> agreed to shelve Larsen's bill for a least a year. <br /> Larsen, a Republican from Lakeland, is trying to <br /> turn back the clock 30 years — to a time before the <br /> Twin Cities metro area had any means to guide plan- <br /> ning and development or to coordinate the delivery of <br /> urban services that transcend municipal and county <br /> boundaries. <br /> Too few legislators remember the days before the <br /> council's birth — when some communities were <br /> dumping untreated sewage into the Mississippi River; <br /> • a private owner was running the region's aging bus <br /> system into the ground; and the Twin Cities lacked <br /> any method for controlling urban sprawl, preserving <br /> open space or resolving regional differences. <br /> And too many lawmakers are inclined to use the <br /> Metro Council as a political whipping boy. Inner-city <br /> legislators fault it for doing too little to encourage <br /> development and reinvestment in the urban core, • <br /> while many suburban representatives oppose any <br /> effort at limiting development on the suburban fringe. <br /> Over the next 25 years, the Twin Cities will need to <br /> accommodate about 330,000 additional households and <br /> 650,000 new residents. Larsen and her allies are naive <br /> if they think local elected officials, working through <br /> some kind of weak planning organization, can make <br /> the tough decisions needed to guide this development. <br /> If anything, the Metro Council needs new incentives <br /> - and powers — carrots and sticks. The council needs <br /> them to help accelerate the cleanup of polluted lands, <br /> encourage reinvestment in blighted or underutilized <br /> areas and make the best use of the billions of dollars_ <br /> . already invested in roads, sewers, schools and other <br /> public facilities in the developed portions of the <br /> region. <br /> Some critics say the Metro Council is "not account- <br /> able," though members serve at the pleasure of the <br /> governor. If that is the problem Larsen is trying to <br /> remedy, the solution may be direct election of Metro <br /> Council members. That idea has been rejected many <br /> times before. But if that is what is needed to have a <br /> strong and effective regional planning organization. <br /> better to make that change than to disband the Metro <br /> • Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.