My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-1997 WS
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
04-21-1997 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2018 1:52:09 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 1:51:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FROM BRIGGS MORGAN SP (THU)04. 17. '97 12:32 NO. 16 PAGE 3 <br /> BRIGGS Axi, MORGAN <br /> Because the tax increment law has been amended so many times since it was first <br /> • adapted in 1979, there are many different rules and limitations which apply, depending <br /> largely on the time in which the tax increment district was created and the type of district. <br /> That is primarily why the City's three main tax increment districts,which were created in the <br /> 1980's, are at least under current law able to "pool" tax increments for legitimate <br /> development and redevelopment purposes elsewhere in the City,even though those activities <br /> are occurring outside of the boundaries of the particular tax increment districts where the <br /> increment is corning from. <br /> This year is another active year at the Legislature for proposals to change the tax <br /> increment law. There continues to be a great deal of concern at the Legislature, at least <br /> among some of its members, about tax increment "abuses" and "accountability". The <br /> Minnesota House seems particularly sensitive to these issues, and we expect its Tax Bill to <br /> propose a number of changes to the law, including restrictions on using tax increment for <br /> public buildings; the requirement that new tax increment districts in the metro area, other <br /> than redevelopment districts, pay fiscal disparities out of the district itself, thereby reducing <br /> the amount of available tax increment; and extensive additional processing required for <br /> changes to tax increment plans or entering into agreements, including public hearings and <br /> detailed findings. It remains to be seen what changes may occur. If you have any questions, <br /> please don't hesitate to call me at 223-6420. <br /> 110 JO/eh <br /> 349683.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.