My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/04/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/04/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:40 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 2:12:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/28/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/28/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • 'bus Tax Bili <br /> Apxi12A, 199'I <br /> f‘d2RlIATI Page 51 <br /> ection <br /> ONLY <br /> Priority for use revenue surpluses. Sets priorities for using forecast revenue . <br /> surpluses in November of odd-numbered years. These amounts will be used first to <br /> ensure$522 million is in the budget reserve account. The rest will be divided: <br /> One-half will be used to reduce the school property tax levy recognition percent to <br /> the 2 percent level. (The levy recognition percent is currently at 7 percent.) <br /> The other half will be used to put in the property tax reform account established in <br /> section 2. <br /> 2 Property tax reform account. Establishes a property tax reform account and <br /> appropriates$487 million to it on July 1, 1997. This account is used to pay for <br /> property tax reform in fiscal years 1998-2001. Investment earnings are credited to <br /> the account. <br /> 3 Budget reserve appropriation. Sets the budget reserve at$522 million on July 1, <br /> 1997. <br /> Article 13: Tax Increment Financing <br /> Overview . <br /> This article makes a number of changes in the tax increment financing (TIF) <br /> law. The changes generally tend to limit the ability of development authorities <br /> and municipalities to,collect and spend increments. The major changes include: <br /> 8. The but-for test is applied to new authorizations and approvals of additional <br /> spending of$50,000 or more in existing TIP districts- <br /> ► Increments that remain unspent when a TIF district is decertified must be <br /> returned to the city/town,county,and school district. <br /> • The ability to use increments to construct governmentally owned facilities is <br /> restricted to instances when it is part of and necessary to induce a private, <br /> taxable development. <br /> ▪ The bill allows small cities (populations of 5,000 or less more than 10 miles from <br /> a city with a population of 10,000 or more) to use economic development <br /> districts for small commercial developments (15,000 square feet or less). <br /> The bill limits the fiscal disparities law option that shifts the cost of the <br /> contribution to taxpayers in the city,county, and school district to <br /> redevelopment districts only. <br /> 8. In addition, the bill adopts an explicit definition of tax increments, clarifies the <br /> spending restrictions applicable to redevelopment districts,and makes a number <br /> of other more minor and clarifying changes. <br /> • <br /> Research Department Minnesota House of Representatives 600 State Office Striding <br /> 2'd S3I l I3 NW JO 31151d31WdOZ:Z0 L6 T2 add <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.