Laserfiche WebLink
Page9 APPROVELI <br /> • April28, 1997 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> from the Minneapolis Public Housing waiting list. The second resolution would be in support of the Ramsey <br /> County Home Funds for the rehabilitation portio of this project. If this resolution is not approved,the funds <br /> would not be set aside for Mounds View. <br /> Ms.Bennett explained that she has discussed other options with MSP in regard to the rental units,however <br /> there is concern that it would affect the financial feasibility of the project She has also contacted both a <br /> commercial and residential developer to obtain ' opinion of the site. The residential developer felt a <br /> housing development would work on the site. Commercial developer,however was concerned about the <br /> condition of the existing apartment as well as about access off of Highway 10 or Eastwood <br /> Ms.Bennett noted that the Economic Development Commission reviewed the concept for this project and <br /> passed a resolution on a 6-0 vote as follows: <br /> "General support for MSP Real Estate's concept proposal as it pertains to the rehabilitation of Red Oak <br /> Apartments and construction of 26 new townhomes. This support is limited to the concepts and land use but <br /> there needs to be further evaluation with regards to the management company and financial analysis. <br /> Therefore,not comfortable with a recommendation to support the use of tax increment financing at this time". <br /> She noted that the EDC requested that this item be brought back at the May meeting and directed the staff to <br /> get some background regarding the management company and the information analyzed by our tax increment <br /> • consultant. <br /> Ms.Bennett reminded the Council that these resolutions would allow the applicants to enter the annual funding <br /> cycle at the public agencies. <br /> Ms.Bennett noted an amendment to Resolution No.5111 and 5112. The final paragraph in Resolution 5111 <br /> should be changed to read, "NOW BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that between the City of Mounds <br /> View,the Mounds View Economic Development Authority and the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority <br /> "The final paragraph in Resolution No.5112 should be changed to read,"NOW THEREFORE BE IT <br /> RESOLVED,that the City of Mounds View,and the Mounds View Economic Development Authority <br /> hereby endorse.. .. ". <br /> Milo Pinkerton,President of MSP Real Estate explained that the present condition of the apartment complex on <br /> the site is one of considerable deferred maintenance,numerous police calls,physical deterioration of the <br /> parking lot,etc. The land next to the apartment site has been For Sale for a number of years and he feels part <br /> of the problem in selling the land is the poor access to the site. He feels their proposal is of the quality that the <br /> neighbors will want in that area. They have obtained resident input in the area and have taken their comments <br /> into consideration. <br /> Peter Bister,of PBDB Architects in Minneapolis presented a diagram of the proposed project. He provided <br /> information in regard to the improvements to the existing building as well as descriptions of the proposed <br /> townhomes. He also noted changes that have been made to the parking areas and more landscaping added. A <br /> one-half acre play area was also added which borders Eastwood Road and will serve both the apartment <br /> buildings and the proposed townhomes. <br /> 40 Jeff Hugget of MSP Real Estate discussed the input they had received from residents in the area. He noted that <br /> many were initially opposed to the proposal,but after obtaining further information,they were in favor of the <br />