My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/07/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/07/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:50 PM
Creation date
6/29/2018 5:11:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/7/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/7/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> July 6, 1997 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 4110 <br /> Option#1 <br /> Make an attempt to determine when the driveway was built, and then allow curb cuts to remain which <br /> predate 1977. Allow property owners to sign an affidavit attesting to when the driveway was built. <br /> There may be no City records which prove or disprove when and how the driveway was built, other <br /> than the initial building permit for the residence. Undertake a systematic program for closing curb cuts <br /> where the initial building permit was later than 1977. <br /> Option#2 <br /> Undertake a systematic program for obtaining compliance from property owners, similar to how the <br /> requirement to put trash dumpsters in enclosures was done. <br /> Option#3 <br /> Require compliance whenever the situation comes to the attention of the City, e.g. when building or <br /> nuisance code inspections are done or the property owner is applying for an approval of some type. <br /> Include removing the second curb cut as a standard item in letters notifying people of nuisance <br /> violations, in conditions of approval on conditional use permits and variances, and in plan reviews for <br /> building permits. <br /> Option#4 <br /> Limit the amount of driveway surface allowed on lots, in proportion to the distance from the street to <br /> the garage or the size of the lot, and let the property owner spend the allotment however they want. <br /> Excessive driveway surface would have to be removed. <br /> a • <br /> Option#5 <br /> Create an incentive program, to go along with Options #1-4. <br /> All of these approaches have advantages and disadvantages. The approach taken depends on how <br /> important the limitation to one curb cut is to the City, and how quickly the City wants to achieve <br /> compliance. Does the City believe it is important enough to provide financial incentives? The usual <br /> response from citizens is that they do not understand why the City wants the second curb cut closed, <br /> and why, when they are applying for a permit to improve their property, the City is requiring that they <br /> remove an improvement they want to keep or that will cost them money to remove. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Discuss the five options presented, and other options as desired by City Council. Provide direction to <br /> staff as to how to proceed with enforcing the requirement that single family residential properties be <br /> limited to one curb cut. Staff will prepare a policy for adoption at the July 14, 1997 meeting based on <br /> direction received. <br /> knt,Ub- kbh-CLe,L0 —_ <br /> Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director <br /> N:\DATA\US ERS\PAMS\SHARE\CITYCOUN\CC-REP\T W O DRI V.REP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.