My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1997 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
09-22-1997 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:05 PM
Creation date
6/29/2018 6:25:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/22/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/22/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPROVED <br /> Page 6 <br /> August 25, 1997 • <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> would withhold the city's support while other opportunities are investigated and if that opportunity does not <br /> work out,the council could go back and authorize the funds. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Stigney to Approve Resolution No. ,Withdrawing Support of Public <br /> Housing Funds. <br /> A discussion followed in regard to the six month sunset clause on the funds whereby if the funds are not used <br /> within six months the funds would automatically go to other competing cities. Ms.Bennett explained that the <br /> $200,000 for the rehabilitation of the project were Ramsey County funds and they were approved by Ramsey <br /> County and set aside until December 31, 1997. The Holman unit funds were approved by a separate <br /> resolution. Discussion also centered around whether the resolutions of support passed by the City Council <br /> would obligate the city to proceed at this time. <br /> Mayor McCarty stated he is concerned about the appearance that the city is"tinkering around"with funds that <br /> are earmarked for persons of less economic stature,etc. He is concerned that having the development <br /> contingent upon a retail conversion could create problems. The neighbors adjacent to the property which <br /> would require a zoning change have not had an opportunity to provide input. He feels the Council should take <br /> time to consider the options,however and work through all of the details. He would be interested to see what <br /> the residents who would be affected by the zoning change have to say. <br /> Attorney Long recommended that the Council delay the resolution and take time to look at the issues more • <br /> closely. <br /> Ms.Trude stated her main point of the resolution is to let the public know that even though the developer made <br /> it appear at the last meeting that he could proceed,he does need the city's support. Mayor McCarty noted that <br /> the other issue is whether or not the developer is dependent upon the funds in order to be able to proceed which <br /> is not known at this time. <br /> MOTION/SECOND:Koopmeiners/Quick to table Resolution No. <br /> VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays(Trude/Stigney) Motion Carried <br /> REPORTS: <br /> Report of Council members: <br /> Koopmeiners: No report. <br /> Stigney: Council member Stigney stated he feels fortunate to have been able to serve with Ms.Trude and he <br /> hopes he will be able to emulate through her example. <br /> Quick: Council member Quick wished Ms.Trude Good Luck. <br /> Mayor McCarty: Mayor McCarty took this opportunity to explain what an Exclusive Negotiating <br /> Agreement meant. <br /> Trude: Ms.Trude encouraged the public to stay on top of the issues affecting residents in the community. • <br /> She stated she has enjoyed working for the residents over the past four years. She took this opportunity to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.