Laserfiche WebLink
UN,APPRQVLTD Page4 <br /> September 22, 1997 • <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> 1 established trailway that the city can hook up to). The residents want to know why the tumback money is not <br /> 2 applied to the project. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 David Jahnke,8428 Eastwood Road,wondered if the Resolution establishing the road requirements in Mounds <br /> 5 View was still in place. Mayor McCarty stated this is still part of the policy and that the minimum road width <br /> 6 in Mounds View is 30 feet. Mr.Jahnke wondered if the policy would need to be changed. Mayor McCarty <br /> 7 stated he believes the Council could authorize that project by their majority motion and he does not believe the <br /> 8 policy binds the Council in a legal fashion. However,he would encourage the council to review the policy to <br /> 9 see if changes need to be made. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Brian Kaden,7675 Spring Lake Road,stated he lives on the corner of the Spring Lake Road/County Road I <br /> 12 intersection. He stated he has observed that less than 50%of the drivers ever acknowledge the stop signs on <br /> 13 the corner. Something needs to be done as this tends to be a confusing intersection. Perhaps the city could <br /> 14 paint a cross walk for the kids so that they can cross the road to go to the lake. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Cameron Obert,8315 Greenwood Drive,stated he was against the standard road width of 30 feet. The wider <br /> 17 the streets are made,the faster the cars travel. He feels the City Council needs to review the standard road <br /> 18 width and look at how the assessments are made for road reconstruction or road improvements. All streets in <br /> 19 the city age and need repair and he is not sure that it is fair for Ramsey County funds to be applied only to <br /> 20 County Roads. <br /> 21 • <br /> 22 Mayor McCarty stated that County roads do take a lot of collector and bus traffic. It was generally felt that the <br /> 23 county should pay for the county roads because they serve a county purpose. While the tumback program is <br /> 24 bringing those county roads back into the authority of the city,Mayor McCarty stated he does not see the <br /> 25 function changing that greatly. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Mayor McCarty suggested that the Council take the assessment policy under advisement at their earliest <br /> 28 opportunity. It was suggested that this be done at the October 6th Work Session,along with the feasibility <br /> 29 study. Mayor McCarty stated he would like to get more information on the project itself prior to that meeting. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 B. (1.) Consideration of Resolution No.5165,Resolution Designating Mounds View City Hall as the <br /> 32 Temporary Polling Location for the November 4,1997 Special Election. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Mr.Kessel noted that the Bel Rae Ballroom is presently undergoing construction and therefore the polling <br /> 35 place will need to be changed. A mailing will be sent out to all registered voters notifying them of this change. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No.5165,Resolution Designating Mounds <br /> 38 View City Hall as the Temporary Polling Location for the November 4, 1997 Special Election. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 41 <br /> 42 B. Consideration of Resolution No.5163,Approving the Refinancing of the 1991 Fire Bonds. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Mr.Kessel noted that in 1991 the City of Mounds View,along with the cities of Blaine and Spring Lake Park <br /> 45 issued a joint bond issue to pay for improvements at several of the fire hall locations. Over the past several <br /> 46 years there has been a change in the bond markets and at this point it would be advantageous for the city to • <br /> 47 refinance. Based upon the bids that came in,the estimated savings for the City of Mounds View would be <br /> 48 approximately$318,000,which will be recognized in the years 2001 through 2012. <br />