Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. <br /> Staff Report No. C7'• <br /> o�oZ3L <br /> Meeting Date: October 6, 1997 <br /> Type of Business: WK <br /> WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council <br /> From: Bruce A. Kessel, Finance Director <br /> Item Title/Subject: Selection of accounting firm to perform financial audits for the <br /> years ending December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999 <br /> Date of Report: September 29, 1997 <br /> In the past, the City has entered into three year contracts with an accounting firm to perform an <br /> independent audit in accordance with state statutes. For the last twelve years, the firm that was <br /> used was Tauges Redpath& Co, Ltd. Our contract with them expired with the completion of the <br /> 1996 audit. <br /> I prepared a request for proposals in accordance with standards set forth by the Government <br /> Finance Officers Association and mailed the information to eleven firms. In addition, I placed a <br /> legal advertisement to inform any other interested firms that we would be considering proposals. <br /> It should be noted that the services requested are considered to be professional services and as <br /> • such, do not require competitive bids nor does the contract for services need to be awarded to the <br /> lowest bidder. <br /> The proposal indicated that the proposals would be evaluated based upon the qualifications of the <br /> firm and individuals assigned to the engagement,the responsiveness to the request for proposals <br /> as well as price. Bids were requested for three years;prices were not to exceed maximums <br /> which allow the City to cancel the contract at the end of any year with no penalty. The proposals <br /> were to be presented based upon two options: 1) The firm selected would perform all the <br /> schedules and would prepare the required annual report; and 2) City staff would prepare most <br /> schedules and would prepare the required annual report. <br /> Five firms submitted proposals. The firms range in size from one office firms with twelve <br /> professional staff to regional firms with numerous offices and 500 professional staff. One firm <br /> performs audits for 5 cities and several perform audits for more than 50 cities; the size of the <br /> cities varies from populations of 100 to 50,000+. Estimated hours for completing the <br /> engagement ranged from 165 hours to 240 hours under the alternative bid for 1998 at average <br /> hourly rates ranging from $57.92 to $74.59. <br /> I used five equally weighted factors to evaluate the proposals: the firm, the staff assigned, <br /> similar clients, the responsiveness of the proposal, and price. For price, I had informed the firms <br /> that had contacted me that I would be using the option where the City perform some of the <br /> schedules and the required report. Since the proposals were for three years, I also used the <br /> second year of the proposal for the evaluation. Based upon this evaluation with 100 points <br />