My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/10/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/10/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:23 PM
Creation date
6/29/2018 6:46:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/6/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/6/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of CIerk/Administrator <br /> Explanations and Directions Performance Evaluation as Team Building <br /> Evaluation as Team Building <br /> If evaluation is to be, in the truest sense, a means of team building, certain conditions must prevail. The two <br /> processes must be compatible and interrelated in the following ways: <br /> 1. Evaluation is basically a means, not an end in itself. <br /> 2. The trust level between the evaluatee and evaluators must be high. <br /> 3. The roles each are to fulfill must be clearly indicated and accepted. <br /> 4. Responsibilities are matched with pre-determined standards of performance. <br /> Definition of Roles <br /> A. Policy Board <br /> • <br /> 1. Conduct annual assessments of performance of the Clerk/Administrator. <br /> 2. Respect the prerogatives of the Clerk/Administrator insofar as operational management function of <br /> of the organization is concerned and the policy function of the Council. <br /> 3. Make assessments in general terms except in instances where specific <br /> improvements are needed or when explicit commendations are due. <br /> B. Clerk/Administrator <br /> 1. Accepts the prospects of annual evaluations. <br /> 2. Understands the scope and thrust of the evaluations. <br /> 3. Expects the evaluations to adhere to the established procedures for <br /> evaluating the performance of the Clerk/Administrator. <br /> Pre-Determined Performance Standards <br /> A performance standard is defined as the condition that will exist when a responsibility of function is successfully <br /> performed. It is essential that a performance standard be established, at the outset, for each of the eight major <br /> areas of responsibility of the CIerk/Administrator. This is necessary in order to use the rating scale effectively. <br /> Major Areas of Responsibility <br /> It should be reiterated that in determining the appropriate Ievel of expectations, actual performance must be <br /> measured in relation to the indicated standard of performance. <br /> Eight major areas of responsibility are identified as the basis upon which assessments are to be made. <br /> Descriptions are provided under each to clarify the meaning and content of the area. However, the evaluation is <br /> made of the major area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.