Laserfiche WebLink
10/20/97 04:37 PM <br /> Street Reconstruction Estimates for next ten years <br /> 50% 30% 0% <br /> Assessment Assessment Assessment <br /> Estimated cost of reconstruction,next 10 years (1997 dollars): <br /> Total area of payment rated 49 or lower 966,059 <br /> Estimated cost per square foot to reconstruct $4.00 <br /> Estimated cost of reconstruction, next 10 years $3,864,236 S3,864,236 $3,864,236 <br /> Funding sources: <br /> Current budget(assumes $80,000 of$125,000 <br /> budgeted in General Fund Pavement <br /> Management-construction account times 10 years 300,000 300,000 300,000 <br /> Special assessments @ % of cost 1.932.118 1.159,271 0 <br /> Subtotal 2,732.113 1,959,271 800,000 <br /> • <br /> "'mated revenue shortfall,next 10 years 51.132,118 51.904.965 53.064.236 <br /> Estimated annual revenue shortfall(total divided by 10) 5113.212 5190.497 5306.424 <br /> Increase in property tax levy from. 1998 proposed GF levy 6.88% 11.58% 18.63% <br /> Optional financing: <br /> Bonding. Issuance costs of$30,000 to 550,000; repayment over a period of time. Most Minnesota <br /> cities issue 10 year bonds, some cities extend the term up to 20 years but normally interest razes <br /> are a lot higher and the bonds normally have a lower rating. Special assessments must equal.at <br /> least 20% of the total bond issue. In addition to repaying the bonds, there is interest and issuance <br /> costs which must be repaid. The bonds are general obligation bonds and are outside of the levy <br /> • <br /> limits. Any bond proceeds must generally be spent on projects within two years. <br /> MSA projects. On MSA projects, maximize the eligible reimbursements,plus assess at 50%of the <br /> total cost. The result should be that the total funding for the project is at approximately 120%of <br /> • <br /> the total cost of the project. The 20%over the cost could then offset some of the shortfall on non <br /> PISA roads. Assuming$330,000 in annual MSA construction funding, over the next ten years,th <br /> would generate approximately$900,000 that could be used to offset or minimize the need to issue <br /> bonds or to substantially increase the property tax levy. <br /> 4110 <br />