Laserfiche WebLink
Mike,Bruce and I have also met to assess the assessment policy/street improvements/funding abilities <br /> of the City, particularly in regards to Spring Lake Road which will be before the Council in full in <br /> November. I have a very hard time looking at these issues without attempting to weigh the <br /> cost/benefits of construction options, the design options apparently favored by Spring Lake Road <br /> residents and the financing problems faced by the City. I think the Council and staff will need to <br /> follow-up with this last work session on this subject and attempt to determine a course of action that <br /> does not require the Council and staff to reinvent the wheel every time a street project comes up. <br /> This will likely mean injecting more design options available to the residents affected and <br /> restructuring the assessment ratios. Doing that however cannot be removed from budgetary <br /> considerations, since those options will likely lead to increases in the City's share of project costs. <br /> We are attempting to put this into some comprehensive format so the Council and community can <br /> understand the impacts of changes to any of the variables involved in these decisions. One aspect of <br /> this discussion that I think the Council needs to consider and remember is that the community at large <br /> is not represented by anyone other than Council, staff and existing policy during discussions with <br /> Spring Lake Road residents. In other words, this is a zero sum equation and changes to the <br /> assessment policies, funding mechanisms and design standards are balanced between immediately <br /> impacted property owners and indirectly taxed but not directly impacted general community. As <br /> stated Monday evening, staff will assist in any changes to any of the policies involved, but remains <br /> in a position of appearing to defend the status quo until directed to do otherwise. The overall <br /> objective needs to be determined, is it to improve streets, keep costs down and/or meet the desires <br /> of the residents directly impacted. Naturally a balance needs to be struck, but right now it is difficult <br /> to determine what the desired balance is or whether it is even understood to be a balance between <br /> • interests and limited resources. Perhaps some additional discussion after the November 5 canvassing <br /> meeting can assist in this. <br />