Laserfiche WebLink
• Memo <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator <br /> Re: November 24, 1997 City Council Meeting <br /> Date: November 21, 1997 <br /> Unfortunately again, I do not have a great deal of time to devote to a packet memo. Monday's <br /> meeting will include the swearing in of Sherry Gunn. Best of luck to you Sherry and welcome to the <br /> City Council. <br /> Item Fl - Spring Lake Road: The main event for Monday evening will be the public hearing <br /> regarding Spring Lake Road. I voiced some concern at the November 3 work session about Council <br /> direction for this meeting and can only suggest that a contrite dialogue be established with the <br /> residents. This possible project has brought many different issues to bare for one street project. <br /> There are engineering questions, ability to pay questions, investment of city resource questions, <br /> environmental questions, traffic questions, property value questions and public representation <br /> questions. There will be no one right answer to a project on Spring Lake Road, only what can be <br /> decided and why. I would ask Council members to keep an objective eye and a open ear to the <br /> • proceedings. Each question and concern expressed, whether it be by residents or staff, has a flip side <br /> which will cost someone something. The City policies have been in place and project calculations for <br /> assessments and engineering have been based on those policies. As was discussed November 3, while <br /> general displeasure has been mentioned with those policies, Council direction for alternatives have <br /> been unclear. <br /> Mike has drafted resolution options in anticipation of possible policy changes. Currently policies <br /> favor a 50/50 split on costs with residents, engineering criteria that values coordinated drainage and <br /> longer term investment value, and an overall interest in maintaining a quality road system within the <br /> City's boundaries. These of course are subjective reasons for the policies and while they can be <br /> changed, the larger reasons for changing them and the impacts of those changes have not been <br /> considered by this Council. Staff will attempt to address those possible issues should they arise on <br /> Monday evening. In general, the Council may want to think about these issues as they come up: <br /> A. Changing engineering criteria to no curb will generally <br /> mean shorting the life of the road and increasing its <br /> maintenance -What is fair to both the residents on <br /> Spring Lake Road and the other City taxpayers for <br /> paying for that shift in policy <br /> B. Lowering assessment portions shifts more street cost to <br /> • other City taxpayers - What engineering criteria <br /> should then be used if the City is to pay for more of <br /> this project, in other words, what is a good investment <br />