Laserfiche WebLink
City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> Planning Case No.506-97 <br /> December 5, 1997 <br /> Page 3 <br /> • qiiMedariiithig <br /> .,,... ;. i c t£�.:€ S F£, r agran r� li s£4 s€€•fs, :€ I t? t€£, i ..,333 � , ;mows <br /> ' �£S€}N _ s 3 <br /> s.�}<z..t,stsntts»>ta#suss�# m I } s,fL x-sx3ussnzssnnza£'`nsass 3£„ �ss££szt:'ss '£°£t££s€: �. Tit _<�._��+Rn,_< _ tiFx.ts sx&.tss."sunt <br /> Any alteration shall not cause a The applicant proposes to fill 11,850 cf of flood Yes <br /> reduction in the flood storage capacity storage capacity but will replace it with an <br /> of the wetland. additional 39,500 cf of flood storage capacity. <br /> Any alteration shall not reduce the It is assumed that the water quality of this Yes <br /> existing water quality enhancement wetland will not be negatively impacted as a <br /> value of the wetland under conditions result of the two homes being constructed,as <br /> of ultimate development long as a minimum 10-foot wide natural area is <br /> left to protect the wetland. <br /> Any alteration shall not reduce the Because more than 50%of the lots will be Yes <br /> existing wildlife habitat value of a protected by a drainage easement and the <br /> wetland. construction area limited to non-wetland areas, <br /> there will be no apparent reduction in the habitat <br /> value for the wetland. <br /> Alterations shall be carried out so as To reasonably use these two lots,vegetation will Yes <br /> to minimize the impact on vegetation. need to be removed for the construction of the <br /> Removal of vegetation within a homes. In addition,vegetation will be removed <br /> wetland zoning district shall be via the filling of one area and the excavation of <br /> permitted only when reasonably another area,but this is to serve a greater need of <br /> • required for the placement of creating additional flood storage capacity that <br /> structures and use ofproperty. will benefit all adjoining property owners of the <br /> wetland. <br /> Stormwater runoff from a development Because of the grading that will occur,it is Yes <br /> may be directed to a wetland when in estimated that potentially less runoff will be <br /> compliance with the local water directed to the wetland. While a manicured lawn <br /> management plan and only when in place of natural vegetation may elevate the <br /> substantially free of sediment, debris level of contaminants entering the wetland, <br /> and chemical pollutants. leaving a ten-foot wide strip of natural vegetation <br /> around the wetland will help cleanse runoff <br /> entering the wetland. <br /> The proposed action shall not cause Currently,all of the runoff from these two lots Yes <br /> stormwater runofffrom a development drain directly into the wetland. As proposed,the <br /> to take place at a rate which would grading and rooflines will direct 50%of runoff <br /> exceed the rate or volume of runoff as toward the street,away from the wetland <br /> anticipated by the City's Local Water <br /> Management Plan. <br /> The quality of water infiltrated to the The quality of the water that will enter into the Yes <br /> water table or aquifer shall remain ground water system as a result of this <br /> substantially unchanged. development is not expected to differ <br /> significantly from before. <br />