Laserfiche WebLink
r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONAgenda Section 1 C <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: /Ma <br /> Report Date: 11/8/96 <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE <br /> j� ``'`' November 12, 1996 Special Order of Bus. <br /> v: <br /> �::sY�Yf ^� <br /> Consent Agenda <br /> d'FSF Partnctsk`t4s <br /> X Public Hearings <br /> Council Business <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Ordinance 590, an ordinance relating to setbacks for parking lots, <br /> driveways, and principal and accessory buildings; minimum lot area for non-residential uses listed as <br /> conditional uses in residential districts; the continued use of non-conforming parking lots for non-residential <br /> conditional uses in residential districts, and amending Title 1100, Sections 1102.01, 1104.01, 1104.02, <br /> 1106.04, 1107.05, 1109.04, 1110.04, 1121.09, 1121.11, and 1123.02;Planning Case No. SP-008-96. <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> -No Comments to supplement this report <br /> -Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) <br /> Summary: <br /> The Mounds View Zoning Code allows for certain non-residential uses to be developed in residential districts <br /> with the approval of a conditional use permit. These uses include: <br /> • Public or semi-public recreational buildings and neighborhood or community centers,public and private <br /> educational institutions limited to elementary,junior high and senior high schools and religious institutions such as <br /> churches,chapels,temples and synagogue. <br /> • Governmental and public utility buildings and structures necessary for the health,safety and general welfare of the <br /> community. <br /> • Day care,group nursery. <br /> • Nursing homes and similar group housing but not including hospitals,sanitariums or similar institutions. <br /> • Parking facilities for adjacent commercial...establishments. <br /> These uses differ from single family residential uses in that they have parking lots. The current setback <br /> requirement for parking lots is five feet from property lines. During the discussions on the New Apostolic <br /> Church, which was proposed on property at 3025 County Road H, it became apparent that citizens feel five <br /> feet is not sufficient to provide adequate buffering between parking lots and residences, and that having a <br /> parking lot that close to their property has a detrimental effect on the residential character of the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Mr. Danny D. Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, has requested that the Zoning Code be amended to require a <br /> minimum 15 foot setback between parking lots and property lines, when the parking lots are for churches or <br /> any commercial uses, and these uses abut residential uses. Section 1125.01, Subd. 2 allows any person <br /> owning real estate within the City to initiate a request to amend the Zoning Code. In studying this request, the <br /> Planning Commission and staff expanded the scope of the proposed amendment to include setting a minimum <br /> lot size for non-residential uses in residential districts, and to clarify other provisions in the Zoning Code <br /> related to setbacks. The Planning Commission is also recommending that the setback between parking lots for <br /> non-residential uses and residential properties be 20 feet for sites of 2.5 acres or less, and 30 feet for sites of <br /> more than 2.5 acres. These dimensions are larger than the 15 feet requested by Mr. Moon, and are based on <br />