Laserfiche WebLink
lir <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: q <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: 94-1288WS <br /> C ,§ AGENDA SESSION DATE SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 Report Date: 9-7-94 <br /> DISPOSITION <br /> Item Description: Discussion Regarding NSP Audit <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: - <br /> /, - <br /> - No comments to supplement this reports <br /> - Comments attached. \, <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> tIJMMARY; <br /> Approximately two weeks ago staff met with representatives from NSP, SEH, <br /> Keating and Assoc. to discuss the proposed City facilities energy audit. <br /> Areas included in the audit were all park facilities, water treatment <br /> plants and well pump motors, public works facility, and the city hall and <br /> police dept. Mechanical inspections would include inspection of all HVAC <br /> systems, lighting, NSP gas and electric rate options, and water production <br /> alternatives. <br /> Staff received a draft proposal from SEH that included all of these areas <br /> for a estimated cost of $35,000. 00. This is a starting point for a total <br /> audit. It is possible that some lower figure may be attainable by <br /> eliminating facilities such as park shelters, that use- relatively little <br /> energy compared to the treatment plants, public works facility and city <br /> hall. Even though NSP will reimburse the City for 15% of the engineering <br /> expense based on energy reductions (approximately $5250) , this is not <br /> guaranteed. Funding for this audit can be from multiple sources, since <br /> audits will include areas in water and sewer. <br /> Staff seeks council discussion and direction in this matter. <br /> # /-/714-4 - -- <br /> Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br /> RECOMMENDATION; <br />