Laserfiche WebLink
HOLMES & GRAVEN <br /> CHARTERED <br /> Antrums at Law <br /> ‘MPAtheia7Cabtar,MicumwaoUsoMaimsa4VWU <br /> Romer A.ALsor {612)9$7.9* Roma C.LONG <br /> RONALD g BA]1Y LAuiw K.Mai= <br /> SizesiEN J.Boom Rgioask3e(612)937.9010 BARRAR.L POUWOOD <br /> .1013N B.DEAN <br /> MARY G.Doaanv$ J - 31CAtolNl�o�rr <br /> Rama N.Cams, JAS J +� <br /> Comm A.Ham <br /> Lama.'NL Wormed <br /> JAKesS illosBoBoma L Wrdois <br /> Ho <br /> JR5 DIRECT DML GARY P.MN= <br /> tvw J.$EN3iIDY <br /> Joh 1L LARsoN 337-9209 DAVID L.GRAvffiv 199I1 <br /> MU/wpm H.Law VIA RAPIFAX AND MAII. <br /> CRAttias L.I fl r p. R COtnvsEi <br /> Jozai K Unmet.gi Ro*ET Co CARiaoN <br /> Ronal'L.DAvmsox <br /> RopEiiaJ.LDWAY.L T_JAY SALMZiv <br /> November 10, 1994 <br /> Samantha Orduno <br /> Clerk-Adtr ird curator <br /> City of Mounds View <br /> 2401 Highway 10 <br /> Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 <br /> RE: Term Limits Charter Amendment <br /> Dear Samantha: <br /> You inquired as to what the process would be if the city council wanted to c4Ilenge <br /> the constitutionality of the term limit charter amendment that was on the November <br /> 8, 1994 ballot. The city council would have essentially two options if it desires to <br /> challenge the constitutionality of the charter amendment provision. <br /> The first option would be to commence a declaratory judgment action in state court. <br /> The action would need to name as a defendant a person or entity that has a stake in <br /> upholding the ballot proposition. Because there is a case currently pending before <br /> the Minnesota Supreme Court (see discussion below), I doubt that a trial court would <br /> decide the city's case until the Minnesota Supreme Court issues its ruling. <br /> The second option would involve not filing a copy of the charter amendment with the <br /> Secretary of State or County Recorder. Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.112, subd. <br /> 4, states that the procedure for filing amendments to the charter is the same as the <br /> procedure followed when the original charter was adopted. Minnesota Statutes, <br /> Section 410.11, sets forth that process. That section provides: "The city clerk <br /> shall file with the secretary of state, the county recorder of the county in which the <br /> city lies, and in the city clerk's office a copy of the charter accompanied by a <br /> certificate attesting to the accuracy of the copy and giving the date of the election <br /> and the vote by which the charter was adopted." <br /> I have checked with the Minneapolis city attorney's office and they inform me that <br /> their case on the constitutionality of term limits is currently pending before the <br /> Minnesota Supreme Court. The question that the Minnesota Supreme Court will <br /> address is whether term limits violate Article 7 Section 6 of the Minnesota <br /> Constitution. (That provision establishes the qualifications to hold elective office.) <br /> The briefing of that issue by the parties is expected to be completed in early <br /> .T79359 <br /> MU125-U <br /> Ia/Z 3O'dd 0ICSLCCZI9'QI Nansdan V S3W'IOH'WO213 9I ,SI T76-0I-AON <br />