My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1994/12/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
Agenda Packets - 1994/12/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:41 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 9:21:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/12/1994
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Thir- <br /> gular Meeting <br /> July 13, L� <br /> Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 9:32 p.m. Councilmember Quick <br /> asked that the Council take a five minute break. Mayor Linke polled the <br /> Council and it was okay with all. <br /> Mayor Linke reconvened the Council meeting at 9:46 p.m. <br /> Mayor Linke introduced Resolution No. Approving or Denying the Development <br /> Proposal known as Greenfield Estates <br />_ Connci imember R-ickaby asked if the- Council did- approve rove the-whole acka <br /> would it deny the entire development. Rickaby stated that this is the <br /> understanding she was given from Mr. Roos' presentation. <br /> Roos stated that if certain items were not approved it could deny the entire <br /> - <br /> i <br /> Jim Thomson made a suggestion to ask for a general motion approving/denyin= <br /> the resolution and then go through and amend it. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Wuori to Deny the Development Proposal Known <br /> As Greenfield Estates <br /> Councilmember Rickaby stated that if Harstad develops this property <br /> and keeps the wetland and wanted to develop property in the wetland <br /> and the City denied it, Harstad could sue us. <br /> Council went through each item on the resolution. The results were a= <br /> follows: <br /> • Request for a Major Subdivision and found that it does conform <br /> with all applicable sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code. <br /> ▪ the Army Corps of Engineers and the City's Engineering Consultant <br /> have reviewed the existing wetland boundary and found that a <br /> discrepancy does exist in the boundaries shown on the City's <br /> official Wetland Zoning Map. <br /> • the City Council approves the Wetland Zoning District Amendment <br /> to the existing boundaries of Wetland No. 1-19 . <br /> • the Developer must meet the conditions outlined in Chapter 48 .06. <br /> Subdivisions i, 2 , and 3 in order to obtain a wetland alteration <br /> permit <br /> • the City's Engineering Consultant has reviewed the development <br /> proposed with regard to Chapter 48 . 06, Subdivisions 1, 2 , and 3 <br /> and found that the request will meet or exceed the requirements <br /> contingent upon receipt of supporting information and approval c <br /> the same. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.