Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Page - --_-- <br /> "lgular Meeting July __ <br /> ▪ it is the practice of the City Council to recommend approval -- <br /> denial of a development in total. <br /> the City Council of the City of Mounds View denies the deveIm=m= <br /> proposal known as Greenfield Estates as the request does nc= <br /> or exceed all requirements for development as defined with <br /> Mounds View Municipal Code. <br /> Councilmember Wuori after going through the entire document rets--her second to the -motion to--den-y--the development proposal. - <br /> Motion died for lack of a second. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick to Approve the Development Proposal <br /> As Greenfield Estates <br /> Council went through each item on the resolution. Amendments tc <br /> resolution were made as follows: <br /> ▪ Request for a Major Subdivision and found that it does confcmf <br /> with all applicable sections of the Mounds View Municipal C-== <br /> • the Army Corps of Engineers and the City's Engineering Cons--= <br /> have reviewed the existing wetland boundary and found that a <br /> discrepancy does exist in the boundaries shown on the City's <br /> official Wetland Zoning Map. <br /> the City Council approves the Wetland Zoning District Amend-i== <br /> to the existing boundaries of Wetland No. 1-19 . <br /> the Developer must meet the conditions outlined in Chapter <br /> Subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 in order to obtain a wetland alterm= <br /> permit <br /> the City's Engineering Consultant has reviewed the developme <br /> proposed with regard to Chapter 48 . 06, Subdivisions 1, 2, a=f = <br /> and found that the request will meet or exceed the requireme <br /> contingent upon receipt of supporting information and apprc <br /> the same. <br /> the City Council approves the Wetland Alteration Permit bas_ <br /> the City Consultant Engineer's findings that the request doesm== <br /> or exceed the applicable sections of the Municipal Code. <br /> the Developer has requested a variance from the 100 foot we---- <br /> setback requirement. <br /> the City Council has reviewed this request and found that <br /> are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances which <br /> this property which do not apply generally to other proper=,.== <br />