My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/08/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/08/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:44 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 9:47:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/28/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CRY OF Agenda Section: 11.B <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 95-1434C <br /> 11117� Report Date: 8-24-95 <br /> STAFF REPORT Council Action: <br /> ❑ Special Order of Business <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE August 28 , 1995 CI Public Hearings <br /> ❑ Consent Agenda <br /> N Council Business <br /> Item Description: <br /> Consideration of Water Meter Changeout Proposal <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> - No comments to supplement this report <br /> Comments attached. <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> SUMMARY; <br /> At the August 21, 1995 Council meeting staff was requested to conduct <br /> additional research for alternative methods of improving the City' s water <br /> meter system and meter reading program. The two alternatives, changing out <br /> meters that are ten (10) years older and doing nothing to the reading <br /> system, and installing a system in-house were researched. <br /> Currently the City has approximately 1, 000 meters that are ten (10) years <br /> old and newer. It is estimated that the current staff could change out <br /> approximately 200 meters every year. Initialy many more meters than 200 <br /> would have to be replaced.This would in essences, take ten (10) years to <br /> update the system to the point where no meter in the system would be older <br /> than ten (10) years old. This approach would do nothing to the reading <br /> program, and would be an on going maintenance activity. This estimate could <br /> vary greatly from year to year, depending on the variety of other scheduled <br /> maintenance activities, emergencies, vacations, and availability to <br /> schedule appointments to perform the replacement of these meters . This <br /> approach is very similar to the current practice, only the number of meter <br /> replaced is greater. Staff would not feel comfortable recommending this <br /> approach. <br /> The second option is to install either Option number 1 or 2 , with in house <br /> staff. Staff would recommend hiring an additional maintenance person, and <br /> a part-time secretary to perform this activity. It is not possible to <br /> perform a change out program of this magnitude with the current level of <br /> staffing. With the two additional staff members and vehicle it is estimated <br /> that the project could be completed in three and a half (3 . 5) to four (4) <br /> years. The expense of this approach in labor alone would be approximately <br /> $235, 000, plus the additional increase in the cost of the meters . The <br /> installation portion of the Phone Read system is $210, 350 . This alternative <br /> would also add an enormous amount of frustration to the reading and billing <br /> programs until the system was completed. This option is not cost effective. <br /> After exploring the two additional options requested by residents and <br /> Council, it appears that discussion of the first three options are still <br /> the most cost effective and efficient means of dealing with the meter <br /> reading program and revenue issues . Once again the three (3) options are <br /> listed below, followed by a recommendation should Council wish to proceed <br /> with Options 1 or 2 . <br /> RECOMMENDATION; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.