Laserfiche WebLink
uNAPPRovED <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> Regular Meeting-August 28, 1995 <br /> 3 <br /> 1 HVAC -Expires June 30, 1996 <br /> 2 White Bear Furnace -Renewal <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired removed from the Consent <br /> 5 Agenda; there were none. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Hankner to Adopt the Consent Agenda as Presented. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 10 <br /> 11 RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Mayor Linke explained that this portion of the meeting was designated for anyone who <br /> 14 wished to speak to the Council on items that were not on the Agenda. There were no <br /> 15 comments or requests from the floor. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> 18 <br /> 19 There were no public hearings scheduled for this meeting. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> 22 <br /> 23 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 4800 Regarding Request for Development Review, <br /> 24 Midwest I.V., Planning Case No. 419-95, Staff Report No. 95-1433C. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator, explained that this was for a <br /> 27 project immediately north of the Bridges Golf Course property. The development <br /> 28 includes an approximately 30,000 square foot facility for manufacturing and office space. <br /> 29 He noted that the Planning Commission reviewed this plan throughout the summer;the <br /> 30 focus of their review was on physical development review of the property which includes <br /> 31 landscaping, parking, wetland implications, drainage on the property, etc. Their findings <br /> 32 were that the development met the intention of the code as was written and they <br /> 33 recommended approval. When it was brought before the City Council, however there <br /> 34 was the issue of drainage on the property and the city's consulting engineer, Short-Elliott- <br /> 35 Hendrickson looked at the plan that had been presented and it was their recommendation <br /> 36 that the entire site also be included in their drainage plans. This would allow future <br /> 37 development of those properties to proceed without having to do a re-planning of the <br /> 38 drainage on the site. The applicant's planning case also included a wetland alteration <br /> 39 permit for his encroachment into the 100 foot buffer zone which surrounds all wetlands. <br /> 40 This was also reviewed by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson and found that encroachment would <br /> 41 not negatively impact the wetland. Based on those findings that the discussions held at <br /> 42 the August 7, 1995 City Council Meeting, staff was directed to draft Resolution 4800. <br /> 43 Mr. Harrington noted that there are two contingencies on the resolution, one is that <br /> 44 landscaping on the property take place according to the direction of the City Forester, and <br /> 45 that the applicant be required to enter into a Development Agreement as the ponding areas <br />