My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/09/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/09/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:50 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 9:58:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/5/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/5/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Project Work Program <br /> Continued :o <br /> • Prepare displays for City offices for view by <br /> public. <br /> Deliverables: Colored layouts, architectural renderings and photo <br /> simulations of <br /> Input on Alternative Selection <br /> Key Staff: Ayaz, Pakalns, BRW <br /> Task A6.0 - Geotechnical Services <br /> Description: Obtain soil borings for each of the bridge <br /> substructure units and provide foundation pile 111 <br /> recommendation. <br /> Subtasks: • Drill foundation borings at proposed bridge <br /> substructure locations. . <br /> • Study and recommend pile type and length for Aim <br /> each of the substructure units. <br /> • Prepare report discussing exploration program, <br /> data obtained and foundation <br /> recommendations. <br /> Deliverables: Geotechnical Subsurface Investigation <br /> Soil Boring Logs <br /> Discussions and Recommendations <br /> Key Staff: Rudd, AET <br /> Task A7.0 - Feasibility Report <br /> Description: Prepare a feasibility study report evaluating bridge <br /> alternatives. <br /> Subtasks: • Determine and evaluate bridge alternatives <br /> • Prepare cost estimate for each alternatives <br /> • <br /> • Discuss advantage/disadvantage for each <br /> alternative • <br /> • Present study for review and discussion by the <br /> City r <br /> BRW, Inc. Pedestrian Bridge Over TH 10 <br /> Qum 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.