Laserfiche WebLink
Page 9 <br /> September 11, 1995 <br /> 1 Ms. Trude noted that one reason the city needs to estimate high is because they are not certain yet what <br /> 2 the tax levels will be in the community because some of the valuations are not set yet. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Mayor Linke stated up until recently the Council had indicated to staff to have a 0% increase in the <br /> 5 property tax levy. However, the Council has since decided that they will look at approximately a 3% <br /> 6 increase to help finance the city's share of the pedestrian bridge. The other 3% is added in the event <br /> 7 that numbers do not work out between now and the end of the year. This is just the high side. The <br /> 8 city cannot exceed the proposed numbers and may even go below them. Right now the other 3% is <br /> 9 not a budgeted number and the city's budget still calls for only the 3% increase for the pedestrian <br /> 10 bridge. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 MsHanlaier Hated that from this time until the budget is actually addoptec�is the time in which <br /> 13 residents should contact the council with their support or concerns. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Mayor Linke explained that on October 24, 1995, there is a Budget Information Hearing scheduled <br /> 16 where the entire budget will be discussed. The Truth in Taxation Hearing is scheduled for November <br /> 17 29th and December 6th. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Ms. Trude commented that the tax increase appears to be due to the pedestrian bridge. Alternatives to <br /> 20 this financing option were also discussed which would not increase property taxes for residents. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Mayor Linke stated this is another issue altogether. At this time, the 3% increase for the pedestrian <br /> 23 bridge appears to be the only way it will go. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Blanchard to approve Resolution 4805, Certifying the 1996 Proposed <br /> 26 Operating Budget, 1996 Proposed Property Tax Levies and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing on the <br /> 27 Same Pursuant to Truth in Taxation Legislation. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 30 <br /> 31 <br /> 32 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 4806, Authorizing the City of Mounds View to Enter into a <br /> 33 Service Agreement with Kerr Transportation Service, Inc. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Ms. Samantha Orduno explained that the Federal Highway Administration and the U. S. Department of <br /> 36 Transportation has mandated an alcohol and drug testing requirement for safety sensitive employees. <br /> 37 The implementation of this rule is as follows: <br /> 38 <br /> 39 1) counties and cities that have 50 or more safety sensitive employees must have complied by January • <br /> 40 1, 1995; <br /> 41 <br /> 42 2) the remaining counties or cities with 49 or less safety sensitive employees must implement a <br /> 43 program by January 1, 1996. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Ms. Orduno explained that this is another Federal mandate that the city must implement by January 1, <br /> 46 1996. The city has contacted Kerr Transportation Services which is the leading employee drug testing <br /> 47 company in the area. It has been determined that the best possible pricing can be obtained if most of <br /> 48 the cities contract with Kerr Transportation. Most of the area cities are going with Kerr <br /> 49 Transportation. They will do the random testing. It is estimated that random testing will be done <br /> 50 anywhere from six to nine times per year. There is a one-time charge of$189.00 which gets the city <br />