My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/09/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/09/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:11 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 10:02:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/26/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/26/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
or resurface a street or perform major repair/replacement <br /> work on sewer and water utilities, before a reasonable <br /> amount of time (10 to 12 years for resurfacing, 12 to 17 <br /> years for partial reconstruction and 17 to 25 years for <br /> total reconstruction) the assessment shall be calculated <br /> on a pro-rata basis . The remaining cost shall be <br /> recovered by means of the general ad valorem property tax <br /> paid by the entire community or by other funds that may <br /> become available to the City for infrastructure cost <br /> recovery. <br /> Subd. 3 <br /> METHODS OF ASSESSMENT <br /> a. The nature of an improvement determines the method <br /> of assessment. The objective is to choose an assessment <br /> method which will arrive at a reasonable, fair and <br /> equitable assessment which will be uniform upon the same <br /> class of property within the assessed area. The most <br /> frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit <br /> assessment, the front footage assessment and the area <br /> assessment . Depending upon the individual project, any <br /> one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to <br /> arrive at an appropriate cost distribution. City staff <br /> will consider all methods and weigh their applicability <br /> to the project and present a recommendation to the City <br /> Council in the form of a mock assessment roll (or rolls) . <br /> A description of each assessment and its corresponding <br /> policy application is presented. A separate section <br /> (Section III) will identify the appropriate matchup of <br /> method with a specific type of project and analyze why <br /> each is generally used. <br /> The purpose of assessment formulas is to allocate <br /> assessed costs among benefitted properties, the formula <br /> should result in a allocation of assessments which is <br /> reasonably related to the benefit received. Any one <br /> predetermined formula will not be appropriate in all <br /> cases because of circumstances unique to the relationship <br /> between the specific project and the specific properties <br /> benefitted. When considering an assessment method or <br /> formula for any given project, it may be necessary to <br /> combine assessment methods or to modify the methods <br /> described below. Therefore, the following description of <br /> methods of assessments should be regarded as guidelines, <br /> which may not be appropriate in all cases . <br /> b. Unit Assessment . A unit assessment shall be derived <br /> by dividing the total project cost by the number of <br /> Residential Equivalent Density (RED) units in the project <br /> area. A RED unit is defined as a single family <br /> residential unit . All platted and unplatted property will <br /> assigned RED unit values equivalent to the underlying <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.