Laserfiche WebLink
r- fricia-x A /w <br /> WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF MOUNDS VIEW RESPECTFULLY <br /> REQUEST THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER OUR EVALUATION OF THE PROS <br /> AND CONS OF ADOPTING NEW STREET STANDARDS FOR LOCAL STREETS. WE <br /> UNDERSTAND THAT: <br /> •WIDER STREETS PROVIDE BETTER FOR PARKING AND TRAFFIC <br /> -THE CITY'S CONSULTING ENGINEERS RECOMMEND A 32' ROAD MIN. <br /> •SOME COUNCILMEMBERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT EMERGENCY <br /> VEHICLE ACCESS WITH CURRENT ROAD WIDTHS <br /> •OUR PREVIOUS CITY ENGINEER PROPOSED A 28' MIN.WIDTH <br /> •WIDER ROADS MEAN A LOSS OF GREEN SPACE, INCL. TREES & SHRUBS <br /> •WIDER ROADS MEAN MORE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, INCREASED <br /> STORM WATER TO MANAGE <br /> •WIDER ROADS CAUSE TRAFFIC TO TRAVEL FASTER <br /> •WIDER ROADS ARE SLIGHTLY MORE COSTLY (INCR. ASPHALT, MOVE <br /> HYDRANTS, UTILITY POLES, REGRADE YARDS & DRIVEWAYS) <br /> •WIDER ROADS WOULD MAKE US LOOK LIKE ALL THE OTHER SUBURBS <br /> Address: Name(priot)/Signature: Preferred road width: -p <br /> '0"3 7 1 KvicYlko c)<-5& <br /> Claupe.. c4 ) <br /> y(35-) y_t3oc,c.L_ <br /> (c3?c/ 41.ass P-1144)1(- 31715-- r <br /> Vas <br /> g3C:2 O (X-2i d L <br /> 3 3 )(--- o/%vim` <br /> '33 /1(---n /(G ac GAlG <br /> 2 t /'("1 //0-10 0 d i)/cfne, /4/ <br /> o) j°r <br /> eA75 Avx jkc, z 41' <br /> 6 ( /errc/i)ee. 1° 0/6C <br /> ala <br /> C- iLU>J <br /> ti-A) <br /> cA., <br /> z��- ,< Q6,,,,J if <br />