Laserfiche WebLink
u fik RirlEn <br /> 3 <br /> Page 6 <br /> October 23, 1995 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> 1 Mr.McDonald,the attorney representing the Suds&Shine Car Wash,contacted Mr. Thompson,the City <br /> 2 Attorney,requesting that the item be reconsidered at the council level. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Mr.Malcolm McDonald explained that there were two reasons they were asking for reconsideration. One of <br /> 5 these was the issue of fairness;the other is that the modifications that are being sought by Mr.Harstad would <br /> 6 be subject to a probationary period(whether six months or 1 year). Mr.McDonald explained that the initial <br /> 7 permit was issued in favor of Ronald Richardson,the current owner. He applied in early 1985 and the council <br /> 8 approved the application for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a Suds&Shine Car Wash in <br /> 9 September 1985. That was too late in the year to construct and open the car wash so it was finally opened in <br /> 10 1986. About the same time as he opened,there was another application before the city to open a Wash Me <br /> 11 Car Wash,and the city approved it without limits as to the hours of operation,permitting it to be open 24 <br /> 12 hours/day. That approval also did not require that an attendant be on duty at all times that the car wash was <br /> 13 open(it was limited to 4 hours per day). <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Mr.McDonald explained that about two years ago,the FINA station sought approval to install a full service <br /> 16 car wash and it was approved with a 24-hour/day operation. This property is,as he understands,closer to an <br /> 17 apartment building that the Suds&Shine Car Wash is to the adjacent single family residences. FINA does <br /> 18 more business that the Suds&Shine and also is noisier. There are now four full-service wash bays that are <br /> 19 open 24 hours per day. The Suds&Shine is the only car wash along Highway 10 that has a limit on the hours <br /> 20 of operation. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Mr.Harstad has entered onto a purchase agreement with Mr.Richardson,contingent upon the city modifying <br /> 23 the Conditional Use Permit to allow the Suds&Shine to be open 24 hours and also to eliminate the <br /> 24 requirement that the attendant be present at all times during operation. His request is to allow him to <br /> 25 compete fairly with the other Mounds View car washes that are open 24 hours per day. Mr.Harstad has <br /> 26 agreed to modify the placing of signs throughout the facility referring to the Mounds View Sound Ordinance, <br /> 27 to insulate the vacuums,and to shut off the vacuums at 10:00 p.m. He also agreed to install trees pursuant to <br /> 28 the applicable codes. Most importantly,he has agreed to have the issue revisited by the City Council in 6-12 <br /> 29 months. He stated he would like to hear comments and concerns from the public in regard to the proposal,so <br /> 30 modifications could be made if necessary. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Mayor Linke stated the council voted to approve the application three to two. The approval,however <br /> 33 required a four-fifths vote. In order to reconsider the vote,those who voted against the motion would have to <br /> 34 ask for that reconsideration. He further explained that comparing the Suds&Shine to the Wash Me Car <br /> 35 Wash is not a fair comparison as Suds&Shine is located in a residential area and the Wash Me Car Wash is <br /> 36 located in a commercial area. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Mr.Thompson,City Attorney,stated he had an opportunity to review the tape from the September 11 meeting <br /> 39 and looked at the letter from Mr.McDonald. It is his feeling that the City Council does have the discretion <br /> 40 whether or not they want to approve or deny the amendment. The procedure to follow in changing their <br /> 41 original decision would be to have the two City Council members who voted against it ask to have the issue <br /> 42 reconsidered. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Ms.Hankner stated she would not be in support of reconsideration of the request. Nothing has changed that <br /> 45 would make her change her decision,and the staff memo outlines all the reason for her decision. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Mr. Quick stated he also agrees with the five points in the staff memo. He does not feel there is any need to <br /> 48 reconsider this item. <br /> 49 <br />