Laserfiche WebLink
CITY s, I Agenda Section: 11.A <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 11 <br /> Report Number: 95-1240C <br /> ownsReport Date: 2-23-95 <br /> STAFF REPORT Council Action: <br /> Dpi% ❑ Special Order of Business <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE February 27, 1995 ❑ Public Hearings <br /> ❑ Consent Agenda <br /> II Council Business <br /> Item Description: Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 544 Vacating Publicly Dedicated <br /> Easements, Mounds View Business Park East, 2nd Addition <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: ��/ � <br /> - No comments to supplement this report \ - 'n1'6�r� <br /> - Comments attached. �_,___ <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> ,SUMMARY; <br /> At the February 13 , 1995 meeting, the City Council formally introduced <br /> Ordinance No. 554 vacating publicly held easements included in the <br /> MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST 2ND ADDITION Plat. Ordinance No. 554 is <br /> now presented to the Council for consideration of final adoption. <br /> For Review: <br /> In the Fall of 1994, the City Council approved the plat known as MOUNDS <br /> VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST 2ND ADDITION for Everest Development. This <br /> Plat included property that will eventually support the Building N <br /> addition to the Mounds View Business Park. <br /> The MVBP East 2nd Addition plat that was approved was a replat of <br /> properties included in two (2) previously approved Plats (Programmed <br /> Land First and Second Additions) . At the time those two plats were <br /> approved, certain easements were taken by the City to provide for <br /> utilities and drainage on the parcels. Since the MVBP East 2nd Addition <br /> plat is a reconfiguration of those original parcels, certain portions of <br /> those easements are no longer necessary. <br /> Because easements are "dedicated to the public forever", these <br /> portions of unnecessary easements are required to be formally vacated as <br /> part of the replat. Please keep in mind that new utility and drainage <br /> easements were provided by Everest at the time of replat, so there is no <br /> net loss in available utility and drainage easements. <br /> I have attached Ordinance No. 554 which formally vacates the appropriate <br /> sections of the easements on the property which are no longer necessary. <br /> s <br /> Paul Harrington, Co unity Development Coordinator <br /> RECOMMENDATION; <br /> Adopt Ordinance No. 554 vacating certain publicly held easements. <br />