My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/06/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/06/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:39 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 11:49:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/26/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/26/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br />SECTION II - METHODS OF ASSESSMENT <br />The nature of an improvement determines the method of assessment. The objective is <br />to choose an assessment method which will arrive at a reasonable, fair and equitable <br />assessment which will be uniform upon the same class of property within the assessed <br />area. The most frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit assessment, <br />the front footage assessment and the area assessment. Depending upon the individual <br />project, any one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to arrive at an <br />appropriate costdistribution. City staff will consider all methods and weigh their <br />applicability to the project and present a recommendation to the City Council in the form <br />of a mock assessment roll (or rolls). A description of each assessment and its <br />corresponding policy application is presented. A separate section (Section III) will <br />identify the appropriate matchup of method with a specific type of project and analyze <br />why each is generally used. <br />The purpose of assessment formulas is to allocate assessed costs among benefitted <br />properties without an actual determination, on a property -by -property basis, of special <br />benefits received. However, the formula should result in a allocation of assessments <br />which is reasonably related to the benefit received. Any one predetermined formula will <br />not be appropriate in all cases because of circumstances unique to the relationship <br />between the specific project and the specific properties benefitted. When considering <br />an assessment method or formula for any given project, it may be necessary to <br />combine assessment methods or to modify the methods described below. Therefore, <br />the following description of methods of assessments should be regarded as guidelines, <br />which may not be appropriate in all cases. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.