Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br />SECTION II - METHODS OF ASSESSMENT <br />The nature of an improvement determines the method of assessment. The objective is <br />to choose an assessment method which will arrive at a reasonable, fair and equitable <br />assessment which will be uniform upon the same class of property within the assessed <br />area. The most frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit assessment, <br />the front footage assessment and the area assessment. Depending upon the individual <br />project, any one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to arrive at an <br />appropriate costdistribution. City staff will consider all methods and weigh their <br />applicability to the project and present a recommendation to the City Council in the form <br />of a mock assessment roll (or rolls). A description of each assessment and its <br />corresponding policy application is presented. A separate section (Section III) will <br />identify the appropriate matchup of method with a specific type of project and analyze <br />why each is generally used. <br />The purpose of assessment formulas is to allocate assessed costs among benefitted <br />properties without an actual determination, on a property -by -property basis, of special <br />benefits received. However, the formula should result in a allocation of assessments <br />which is reasonably related to the benefit received. Any one predetermined formula will <br />not be appropriate in all cases because of circumstances unique to the relationship <br />between the specific project and the specific properties benefitted. When considering <br />an assessment method or formula for any given project, it may be necessary to <br />combine assessment methods or to modify the methods described below. Therefore, <br />the following description of methods of assessments should be regarded as guidelines, <br />which may not be appropriate in all cases. <br />