My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-1995 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
05-08-1995 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:51 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/8/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/8/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br /> SECTION II - METHODS OF ASSESSMENT <br /> The nature of an improvement determines the method of assessment. The objective is <br /> to choose an assessment method which will arrive at a reasonable, fair and equitable <br /> assessment which will be uniform upon the same class of property within the assessed <br /> area. The most frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit assessment, <br /> the front footage assessment and the area assessment. Depending upon the individual <br /> project, any one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to arrive at an <br /> appropriate cost distribution. City_staff will consider all methods _and weigh their <br /> applicability to the project and present a recommendation to the City Council in the form <br /> of a mock assessment roll (or rolls). A description of each assessment and its <br /> corresponding policy application is presented. A separate section (Section III) will <br /> identify the appropriate matchup of method with a specific type of project and analyze <br /> why each is generally used. <br /> The purpose of assessment formulas is to allocate assessed costs among benefitted <br /> properties without an actual determination, on a property-by-property basis, of special <br /> benefits received. However, the formula should result in a allocation of assessments <br /> which is reasonably related to the benefit received. Any one predetermined formula will <br /> not be appropriate in all cases because of circumstances unique to the relationship <br /> between the specific project and the specific properties benefitted. When considering <br /> an assessment method or formula for any given project, it may be necessary to <br /> combine assessment methods or to modify the methods described below. Therefore, <br /> the following description of methods of assessments should be regarded as guidelines, <br /> which may not be appropriate in all cases. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.