Laserfiche WebLink
Moe’s Liquor License Report <br />January 25, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />As the City Council is aware, staff is working with the City Attorney’s office to redraft the <br />liquor license chapters. One of the issues to be considered is whether payment of <br />property taxes should be one of the license requirements, and whether such <br />delinquency at any point during the license period should trigger a suspension or <br />revocation action. No other business type in the City—licensed or otherwise—is <br />required to be current on property taxes as a condition of operating within the City. In <br />my opinion, license revocation would seem to be a disproportional consequence for an <br />action unrelated to the nature of the licensed business. A revision of the liquor code <br />might include general actions and conditions such as the following as triggers to <br />consider license suspension or revocation: <br /> <br />• Sale of alcohol to minors <br />• Excessive calls for service <br />• Criminal activity <br />• Nuisance Code violations <br />• After-hours sales <br />• Sale to intoxicated patrons <br /> <br />A draft of the liquor code revisions is anticipated for Council review at the March <br />worksession. <br /> <br />Summary: <br /> <br />The payment plan for the delinquent property taxes associated with Moe’s was <br />approved by the Council on October 26, 2009. The agreement required that the <br />delinquent taxes be paid by May 1, 2010, with $20,000 paid no later than January 11, <br />2010. Mr. Moritko fell short of the January 11 goal and requests that the paid-in-full <br />deadline of the delinquent property taxes be extended to June 14, 2010. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />While Resolution 7557 has been prepared which would revoke the on-sale intoxicating <br />liquor license for Moe’s at 2400 County Road 10 as of January 26, 2010, the City <br />Council should discuss whether such a revocation action would be in the best interest of <br />the community and whether the penalty is reasonable given the present economic <br />climate. While the January 11 deadline was not met, the owner is making progress <br />toward payment of property tax delinquencies and has fully satisfied the Department of <br />Revenue tax obligations which previously precluded the owner form purchasing alcohol. <br />If the Council chooses to NOT revoke the Moe’s liquor license, a resolution would be <br />available for action that would extend the deadline for payment of delinquent property <br />taxes consistent with the license period, which expires June 30, 2010. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Clerk-Administrator