Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 8, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if it was worth hiring and training the engineering intern for 2010. 2 <br />City Administrator Ericson suggested the specific term of the position be changed instead 3 <br />through an additional Item on the Resolution, Item 4 could read “Funding in subsequent years 4 <br />shall be subject to Council authorization.” This would eliminate the need for the Council to 5 <br />review the Resolution and would be handled through the budget process. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Stigney did not want the engineering position buried in the budget discussion. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned if the engineering intern should be treated like a seasonal employee. 10 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he has made an amendment to the motion and would like the 11 <br />Council to vote on the motion on the table. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Mueller suggested staff bring this item to the Council in November to assure 14 <br />that staff does not lose the position after December of 2010. Director of Public Works DeBar 15 <br />agreed with this suggestion stating he would not want to lose the skilled intern and have to 16 <br />retrain a new hire. He felt the position should not be treated as a seasonal employee. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked why the previous intern was not reviewed on a yearly basis. Director of 19 <br />Public Works DeBar stated the intern position was not treated as a seasonal position. However, 20 <br />if the Council would like this reviewed in November he would bring it back to the Council for 21 <br />yearly approval. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mayor Flaherty called for a vote on the Resolution amendment. 24 <br /> 25 <br /> Ayes – 2 Nays – 3 (Flaherty, Hull, Gunn) Amendment failed. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Flaherty called for a vote on the original motion. 28 <br /> 29 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Hull left the Council Chambers. 32 <br /> 33 <br />E. Resolution 7571, Adopting the 2008 Mounds View Comprehensive Plan. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Community Development Director Roberts reviewed the past consideration of the City’s 36 <br />Comprehensive Plan Update and presented staff’s recommendation for the Council to move 37 <br />forward with adoption and implementation of the 2008 Mounds View Comprehensive Plan 38 <br />Update. He noted the resolution would take that action and incorporates the Tier II Sewer Plan 39 <br />information. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Mueller asked what would happen if the City could not meet what the Met 42 <br />Council was predicting and forecasting, as the land use changes from 2010-2030 for the City of 43 <br />Mounds View. Community Development Director Roberts indicated the City would not be 44 <br />penalized for not meeting the forecasts as this was predicted regional growth. The City was to do 45