Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 07A <br />Meeting Date: March 22, 2010 <br />Type of Business: CB <br />Administrator Review : ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Jim Ericson, Clerk-Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 835, an <br />Ordinance Amending Title 500 of the Municipal Code <br />Regarding Charitable Gambling <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Staff had identified many deficiencies in our City Code relative to Charitable Gambling and <br />initiated a process to amend Title 500 of the Code to remove the relevant charitable <br />gambling requirements from the two liquor license chapters and create a new, standalone <br />chapter addressing such issues. Staff has been working with the City Attorney on the <br />matter and at the September 2009 work session, the Council reviewed a draft of the <br />ordinance. While some questions remained unanswered, the ordinance was referred to <br />the September 14, 2009 Council meeting for a first reading. <br /> <br />Because of questions associated with the proposed “10% fund”, the ordinance was put on <br />hold and representatives from the two organizations licensed to conduct charitable <br />gambling in the City were invited to attend the Council’s December 2009 work session. <br />Representatives from Lake Region Hockey Association and Spring Lake Park Lions asked <br />the City to reconsider establishing a 10% Fund as there was very little gambling revenue <br />available and any further reduction after State taxes and other expenses would further <br />inhibit their ability to “give back” to the trade area. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The draft ordinance was brought back to the City Council at their March 2010 Work <br />session in an effort to get direction regarding the 10% Fund as well as local permits. The <br />Council consented to removing the 10% language from the ordinance but wanted to review <br />the matter again in a year to determine whether such an amendment would make sense. <br />(Staff has made note of this.) As for Local Permits, the City has the option of whether or <br />not it would like to approve such activity exempted or excluded by the State. After much <br />deliberation, a consensus was reached that exempt and excluded lawful gambling would <br />not need to be approved by the City. The other change proposed by the revised ordinance <br />would require that a licensed organization would be ineligible for a premises permit if their <br />organization was not local to the trade area. <br /> <br />The ordinance as revised based on direction expressed at the March work session was <br />presented for first reading on March 8, 2010. There have been no further changes or <br />revisions to the ordinance since the March 8 council meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />