My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/09/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/09/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:14 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 12:02:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/27/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/27/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 07D <br />Meeting Date: Sept 27, 2010 <br />Type of Business: CB <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 854, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 515 Regarding Tattoo <br />Licensing <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />During the last legislative session, a new law was adopted to regulate body piercing and <br />other body modification services (comprehensively referred to as “body art” <br />establishments) in Minnesota. Mounds View has had provisions regulating these <br />businesses since 2000, when the City Council adopted Ordinance 663. No such business <br />ever located in the community, although there have been a few inquiries over the years. <br /> <br />With the new state regulations, the League of MN Cities recommends cities examine their <br />city codes and make any necessary amendments or revisions to maintain or achieve <br />consistency. (The City’s code may be more restrictive but cannot be less restrictive than <br />MN Statutes.) Staff asked the City Attorney’s office to review our City Code relating to <br />Tattoo and Body Piercing Establishments (Chapter 515) and to propose amendments to be <br />compliant with the new legislation, which will be effective January 1, 2011. <br /> <br />The Council reviewed the proposed revisions at their work session meeting on September <br />7, 2010 and was generally supportive of the changes. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The City Council adopted its licensing requirements for such businesses in 2000 in <br />response to an inquiry to locate such a business in the City. While the business chose to <br />locate elsewhere, the Council felt that having a strong framework of licensing requirements <br />would be beneficial, since at that time, the state had no oversight in such businesses. The <br />intent of the ordinance was as follows: <br /> <br /> <br />The purpose of this Section is to regulate the business of tattooing, body piercing, body <br />branding, body scarring or body painting in order to protect the health and welfare of the <br />general public. The City Council finds that the experience of other cities indicates that there <br />is a connection between tattooing and hepatitis and other health problems. The City Council <br />finds that stringent regulations governing tattooing can minimize the hepatitis and disease <br />risk and therefore protect the general health and welfare of the community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.