Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 07H <br />Meeting Date: Oct 11, 2010 <br />Type of Business: CB <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 854, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 515 Regarding Tattoo <br />Licensing <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />During the last legislative session, a new law was adopted to regulate body piercing and <br />other body modification services (comprehensively referred to as “body art” <br />establishments) in Minnesota. Mounds View has had provisions regulating these <br />businesses since 2000, when the City Council adopted Ordinance 663. No such business <br />ever located in the community, although there have been a few inquiries over the years. <br /> <br />With the new state regulations, the League of MN Cities recommends cities examine their <br />city codes and make any necessary amendments or revisions to maintain or achieve <br />consistency. (The City’s code may be more restrictive but cannot be less restrictive than <br />MN Statutes.) Staff asked the City Attorney’s office to review our City Code relating to <br />Tattoo and Body Piercing Establishments (Chapter 515) and to propose amendments to be <br />compliant with the new legislation, which will be effective January 1, 2011. <br /> <br />The Council reviewed the proposed revisions at their work session meeting on September <br />7, 2010 and was generally supportive of the changes. On September 27, 2010, the <br />Council approved the first reading and introduction of the ordinance. No changes or <br />revisions have been made from the version presented September 27th. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The City Council adopted its licensing requirements for such businesses in 2000 in <br />response to an inquiry to locate such a business in the City. While the business chose to <br />locate elsewhere, the Council felt that having a strong framework of licensing requirements <br />would be beneficial, since at that time, the state had no oversight in such businesses. <br /> <br />The original ordinance outlined the license requirements, locational requirements, <br />operational requirements, health and sanitation requirements, license fees, investigation <br />fees, temporary licenses, suspension and revocation standards and exemptions. While the <br />ordinance was quite comprehensive, the newly adopted legislation addresses all of these <br />issues and more, incorporating newer trends in body art and body modification. The <br />attorney recommends that the much of the Chapter be deleted, in deference to the new <br />legislation, as adopted or amended. Certain provisions will remain in place in the City <br />Code. <br /> <br />