My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2009/02/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agenda Packets - 2009/02/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:33 PM
Creation date
7/4/2018 10:26:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/9/2009
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 9, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />11. REPORTS 1 <br />A. Reports of Mayor and Council. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Mueller announced that the Concerned Citizens of the North Metro will hold a 4 <br />meeting regarding the Anoka County Blaine Minor Airport on Tuesday, February 24, 2009, from 5 <br />7-9 p.m. at the Spring Lake Park City Hall. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Gunn commented on the success of the Irondale High School Dance held on 8 <br />Saturday night at the Community Center. 9 <br /> 10 <br /> B. Reports of Staff. 11 <br />1. Report from Bonestroo Regarding Design Issue on the County Road 12 <br />10 Trail Segments 1-5. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Joe Rhein, Consulting Engineer with Bonestroo, advised of the elevation issues found to be 15 <br />present with the trail segment along the north side of CR 10 just west of Wooddale Drive. The 16 <br />Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) indicated that drainage in this area would more directly 17 <br />impact Rice Creek and determined to require rate control with this project. Mr. Rhein presented 18 <br />a diagram of the subject area, trail alignment, and explained the drainage direction. He stated the 19 <br />open ended storm drainage pipe in the ditch can be improved with a structure with a reduced 20 <br />opening to satisfy the rate control for less than $3,000 on this $800,000 project. However, 21 <br />detailed storm water modeling was required to prove the rate control to the RCWD. That 22 <br />modeling cost about $4,000 and identified that the pond and ditch are hydrologically connected 23 <br />so during large storm events, the pond water would overtop about 250 feet of the trail. During a 24 <br />50-year storm event, the maximum water depth on the trail would be 3.5 inches for about an hour 25 <br />and 10 minutes. Then the storm sewer would drain away the water and the pond elevation would 26 <br />go down below the trail elevation. During a 100-year storm event, the maximum water depth 27 <br />over the trail would be 9 inches and appear to be one pond area. This would last for 2.5 hours 28 <br />and then the water would recede to be lower than the trail. Mr. Rhein advised there is a 2% 29 <br />chance during any given year that 50-year event will occur and a 1% chance that a 100-year event 30 <br />will occur. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mr. Rhein stated if the Council deems this condition acceptable, recognizing the trail may 33 <br />become overtopped during certain heavy storm events but dry after the storm event, no action 34 <br />was needed, there would be no additional cost or delay in the project. If the Council deems this 35 <br />condition to not be acceptable, staff can investigate the option of raising the elevation of the trail 36 <br />6 to 10 inches so it is above the overflow elevation during peak storm event. Since this would 37 <br />result in additional wetland impacts, permitting through the DNR, Army Corp of Engineers, and 38 <br />RCWD would be required. The cost is estimated to be $20,000 to $25,000 to repeat the 39 <br />permitting process, purchase additional wetland credits from the State’s wetland bank, and to 40 <br />construct a trail berm that is raised by ten inches in height. In addition, the project schedule 41 <br />would be delayed one month and there is no guarantee reviewing agencies would approve the 42 <br />added wetland impact. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.