My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2009/03/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agenda Packets - 2009/03/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:02 PM
Creation date
7/4/2018 10:32:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/23/2009
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 23, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />Establishing the Components of the Private Improvement Program in Conjunction with the Street 1 <br />and Utility Improvement Program. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Mueller put residents on notice that this project will start in the spring so they 4 <br />have time now to call contractors and get information. She asked whether the agreement would 5 <br />have a “safety net” and implied consent if a signature were not submitted to the City by a certain 6 <br />date. Mr. Rhein explained that the agreements will be handled administratively and needs to be 7 <br />signed and in place 24 hours prior to the start of construction. If a signed agreement is not in 8 <br />place, the work on private property would not occur. He explained that Staff would like to solicit 9 <br />interested residents to use this process to assure the new street and curb project do not need to be 10 <br />disturbed to complete improvements on private property. 11 <br /> 12 <br />The Council discussed the option of requiring a $500 deposit if the improvement cost is assessed 13 <br />for 5 or 10 years. Finance Director Beer noted the City did not want to discourage anyone from 14 <br />using this option. Mr. Rhein stated the most common improvement is to widen the access and he 15 <br />does not think there will be so many sanitary sewer improvements that it affects the cash flow of 16 <br />this project. 17 <br /> 18 <br />In response to Council Member Stigney’s questions, Mr. Rhein stated there would be no cost to 19 <br />residents to match the existing driveway width and transition the driveway to the property line. If 20 <br />the property owner wants the new bituminous driveway all the way to the garage, they would 21 <br />have to enter into a private agreement with a contractor. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested the process be looked at after the first part of the project is 24 <br />completed. Finance Director Beer stated the Council could modify the program at any time 25 <br />during the project. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Flaherty suggested a threshold be established that if a certain percentage of properties take 28 <br />advantage of this option, raising a concern with cash flow, it would be cut off. Mr. Rhein 29 <br />suggested the threshold be established using a dollar amount rather than a percentage. Finance 30 <br />Director Beer recommended the maximum of $100,000. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Stigney noted that private property improvements outside the project area are 33 <br />not addressed in the resolution. Mr. Rhein stated if an improvement comes up during the project, 34 <br />they would return with a revised resolution. He explained that anyone can talk with the City’s 35 <br />contractor and pay them privately to do their driveway but that would be outside of the City’s 36 <br />contract. The City can provide interested residents with the rate being paid for this project. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if residents would need to obtain a City permit for driveway 39 <br />improvements on private property. Mr. Rhein stated they would if the improvement is outside 40 <br />this contract. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Finance Director Beer clarified that private improvements from the right-of-way to the garage 43 <br />will not be assessed and have to be paid by the property owner. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.