Agenda Packets - 2009/08/24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council July 27. 2009 Regular Meeting Page 8 Council Member Stigney suggested in Subdivision a, to use the term “day care” or “group 1 facility” instead of “nursery.” 2 3 Clerk-Administrator Ericson noted that churches, schools, and institutions referenced already 4 require a CUP and asked if it is the Council’s intent to require a second CUP to allow a day care. 5 He noted it could be considered an accessory use to a facility that has obtained a CUP to operate. 6 Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated if that is the Council’s desire, consideration could be tabled 7 to allow time for staff to draft appropriate language. 8 9 Council Member Gunn stated clarification is also needed for what is meant by “day care center” 10 and “group nursery.” Clerk-Administrator Ericson explained that most definitions are from the 11 State Code and staff will provide additional information for the Council’s consideration. 12 13 D. Resolution 7481, Authorizing Step Increases for Officer Peter Berling 14 (MVPD), Officer Nick Erickson (MVPD), Michael Strand (Cable), and Don 15 Burda (Community Development). 16 17 Assistant Clerk-Administrator Crane presented the recommendation to authorize step increases 18 for Officer Peter Berling, Officer Nick Erickson, Part-time Cable Technician Michael Strand and 19 Temporary Building Inspector Don Burda since each supervisor has reviewed performances and 20 all are deemed to be satisfactory. Assistant Clerk-Administrator Crane explained that the 21 increase for Don Burda should have been considered in May but was overlooked. Mr. Burda had 22 resigned effective July 23, 2009. She read Resolution 7481. 23 24 Council Member Gunn suggested the first line of the resolution be revised to add “part-time” 25 since Mr. Burda was a part time employee. 26 27 Council Member Mueller suggested that contract employees be contained in a separate 28 resolution. She explained that some residents have questioned why step increases are being 29 given but with contracts, increases are covered by union negotiations. 30 31 Council Member Stigney asked why it is fair to consider an increase for a union employee but 32 not a City employee. He stated one of his concerns is that with a police officer at Step 5, they get 33 an automatic longevity increase of three percent at four years of service. 34 35 Mayor Flaherty stated he has no issue with all increases being contained within the same 36 resolution. 37 38 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Mueller. To Adopt Resolution 7481, Approving Step/Longevity 39 Adjustments, as corrected to add “part-time” to the first line. 40 41 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 42 43 8. CONSENT AGENDA 44 A. Licenses for Approval. 45