Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 27. 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />George Winiecki, 2704 Highway 10, stated why he objects to the Business Registration Program. 1 <br />He asked whether he will be required to pay for registration fees plus his business permit, and if 2 <br />each unit owner in his office complex will also pay a fee to register. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Tim Roche, Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce, stated he spoke before the EDC when 5 <br />this Program was considered to voice business owner’s objections to a registration program, 6 <br />primarily because of the fee. Another concern was that not registering would result in a 7 <br />misdemeanor, which may impact a businesses’ ability to obtain a liquor license. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated all agree with the concept to obtain business owner contact information 10 <br />and the consideration tonight does not establish a fee. He noted he had indicated at the last 11 <br />meeting that he did not support a registration fee and believed the value of such a program would 12 <br />be greater to the City than to the business owner. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mr. Winiecki stated his objections again, adding that he is tired of government intervention in 15 <br />small businesses. Council Member Gunn clarified that the renter is held responsible to register, 16 <br />not the business owner. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if violation has to be a misdemeanor. Clerk-Administrator Ericson 19 <br />explained that any violation of the City Code results in a misdemeanor but the Council can set a 20 <br />different fine when the fee schedule is considered. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Council Member Mueller suggested this consideration be tabled to obtain more feedback from 23 <br />business owners. 24 <br /> 25 <br />SUBSTITUTE MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Postpone Consideration of Second 26 <br />Reading of Ordinance 821, Adding Language to the City Code about Business Registration, to 27 <br />August 24, 2009, to allow staff time to obtain input from businesses. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mr. Winiecki stated why he believed the City should require home occupations should to register 30 <br />in such a program. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if it would be better to postpone consideration to a Work Session 33 <br />so the Council can discuss what staff will be presenting. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Members Mueller and Hull agreed to a friendly amendment to postpone to the 36 <br />September Work Session for further discussion. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Mueller stated she was excited about the business registration program but 39 <br />questioned the value to the business community and would like more input. 40 <br /> 41 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Flaherty) Motion carried. 42 <br /> 43 <br />C. First Reading – Zoning Code Amendments. 44 <br />1. First Reading of Ordinance 827, Revising Chapter 1104.01, Subd. 5c, 45