Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 27. 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney suggested language be added to restrict a 20-foot high flat roof. 1 <br /> 2 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Approve First Reading of 3 <br />Ordinance 828, Amending Chapters 1102, 1104, and 1106 of the Mounds View Zoning Code 4 <br />pertaining to the Definition of Building Height, the Maximum Allowed Accessory Building 5 <br />Height, and Required Accessory Building Separation Distance, revising Section 3g to remove: 6 <br />“whatever is less.” 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Members Stigney and Council Member Gunn stated their support to not revise Section 9 <br />3, Item b, because it could result in an accessory building that is taller than the principal 10 <br />structure. 11 <br /> 12 <br />AMENDMENT MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Flaherty. To revise Ordinance 828 to indicate the 13 <br />roof type shall conform to the roof type on the principal structure. 14 <br /> 15 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Amendment motion carried. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Council Members Muller and Council Member Hull accepted a friendly amendment to revise 18 <br />Section 2f to indicate: “The height of any detached accessory building shall not exceed 20 feet.” 19 <br />and revise Section 3b to remove: “or that of the principal structure, whatever is less.” 20 <br /> 21 <br />Council Member Stigney asked why the City would want to allow an accessory building that is 22 <br />taller than the principal building. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated he does not want to show bias or restrict a property with a smaller home. 25 <br />Council Member Mueller agreed and noted that residents want to park their motor homes inside. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Council Member Stigney stated with the amendment, a 20-foot high garage could be constructed 28 <br />alongside a 15-foot high home. He suggested that a variance process be required for that 29 <br />scenario and stated that he does not support this amendment, even for first reading. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated he has a problem with a building that is out of character for a 32 <br />neighborhood and 20 feet may be too tall for some areas. Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated a 33 <br />typi cal rambler, depending on the roof pitch, would be 14 to 16 feet in height. Mayor Flaherty 34 <br />stated he supports a maximum height of 15 feet and to require a variance for a taller structure. 35 <br /> 36 <br />The Council discussed and agreed clarification is needed for the method of measurement. 37 <br /> 38 <br /> Ayes – 2 (Mueller, Flaherty) Nays – 3 Motion failed. 39 <br /> 40 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Approve First Reading of 41 <br />Ordinance 828, Amending Chapters 1102, 1104, and 1106 of the Mounds View Zoning Code 42 <br />pertaining to the Definition of Building Height, the Maximum Allowed Accessory Building 43 <br />Height, and Required Accessory Building Separation Distance, revised to indicate the roof type 44 <br />shall conform to the roof type on the principal structure. 45